By interacting organism › Plants › Poaceae › Zea mays subsp. mays

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant johnsongrass had greater height, tiller number and aboveground fresh weight than susceptible plants when competing with corn or sunflower.

Taxon: johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0
Material: R populatione0
Interactor: corn or sunflowerHelianthus annuus Zea mays subsp. mayse0other
Outcome: H, TN, and AFWe0
Direction: greatere0
Comparator: S populatione0

Verbatim

e0
“the R population grown in interspecific competition with corn or sunflower produced greater H, TN, and AFW than the S population.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–990

t0
“Intra- and Interspecific Competition Between Ile1781Leu ACCase-Resistant and Susceptible Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Populations and Corn or Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155

Title

Intra- and Interspecific Competition Between Ile1781Leu ACCase-Resistant and Susceptible Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Populations and Corn or Sunflower

Aristeidis P. Papapanagiotou; Ioannis Vasilakoglou; Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos Agronomy 2026. doi:10.3390/agronomy16090915

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both johnsongrass populations grew more with corn than sunflower competition.

Taxon: johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0
Material: R and S populationse0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse0other
Outcome: H, TN, and AFWe0
Direction: moree0
Comparator: sunflowere0

Verbatim

e0
“both R and S populations growing in competition with corn produced more H, TN, and AFW than those growing in competition with sunflower.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1140

t0
“Intra- and Interspecific Competition Between Ile1781Leu ACCase-Resistant and Susceptible Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Populations and Corn or Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155

Title

Intra- and Interspecific Competition Between Ile1781Leu ACCase-Resistant and Susceptible Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Populations and Corn or Sunflower

Aristeidis P. Papapanagiotou; Ioannis Vasilakoglou; Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos Agronomy 2026. doi:10.3390/agronomy16090915

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn seeds were among the least affected by Photinia × fraseri extracts.

Taxon: Photinia × fraseriPhotinia ×fraserit0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse3other
Outcome: least affectede3

Verbatim

t0
“Photinia × fraseri”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53

e3
“while corn and wheat were the least affected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–849

Title

In vitro allelopathic potential of Photinia × fraseri extracts on the seed germination of selected crop and weed species

Gülce Bayhun; Nadim Yılmazer Bioscience Journal 2025. doi:10.14393/bj-v41n0a2025-76306

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition from a dense stand of corn reduced scouringrush biomass by approximately 50%.

Taxon: Equisetum hyemaleEquisetum hyemalee1
Treatment: competition from a dense stand of corne2
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse2other
Outcome: scouringrush biomasse2
Direction: reducede2
Value: approximately 50%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Scouringrush ( Equisetum hyemale L.) is an increasing problem in some fields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76

e2
“Repeated tillage or competition from a dense stand of corn reduced scouringrush biomass approximately 50%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–754

Title

Integrated management of scouringrush (Equisetum hyemale)

Eric E. Frasure; Mark L. Bernards Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2025. doi:10.1139/cjps-2024-0189

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Chlorsulfuron (158 g a.i. ha −1) reduced scouringrush biomass by 100% one year after application in field trials.
Intervention effect Dichlobenil (6700 g ha −1) reduced scouringrush biomass by 70% one year after application in field trials.
Intervention effect Repeated tillage reduced scouringrush biomass by approximately 50%.
Intervention effect Repeated mowing did not reduce scouringrush stem count or biomass.
Intervention effect Chlorsulfuron was the only treatment that completely controlled scouringrush.
Intervention effect Foliar- and soil-applied chlorsulfuron reduced corn biomass in a greenhouse study.
Intervention effect Foliar- and soil-applied chlorsulfuron reduced soybean biomass in a greenhouse study.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteus with two treatments had 82% biological efficiency against the pest.

Taxon: Ostrinia furnacalisOstrinia furnacalise1
Treatment: Proteuse0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse2host
Outcome: biological efficiencye0
Direction: highe0
Value: 82 %e0
Qualifier: two-fold treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The preparation Proteus has a high biological efficiency against the pest with two-fold treatment of plants – 82 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1468

e1
“eastern corn borer (Ostrinia furnacalis Guenee, 1854)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–162

e2
“to assess their impact on the seed productivity of corn.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–223

Title

BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PROTECTION MEANS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE EASTERN CORN BORER (OSTRINIA FURNACALIS GUENEE, 1854)

Ol'ga Telichko; Elena Lastushkina; Oksana Syrmolot Bulletin of KSAU 2025. doi:10.36718/1819-4036-2025-3-72-79

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Biokill with a single use had the minimum efficiency, 52%.
Intervention effect Proteus positively affected corn seed productivity.
Intervention effect Biokill positively affected corn seed productivity.
Intervention effect Espero positively affected corn seed productivity.
Intervention effect Proclaim positively affected corn seed productivity.
Intervention effect Two Proteus applications significantly increased grain per cob by 26.8 g versus control.
Intervention effect Two Proteus applications significantly increased 1000-grain weight by 98 g versus control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogenicity was comparable between fungal genotypes in both nitrogen regimes.

Taxon: Ustilago maydisMycosarcoma maydise3
Treatment: Δnit2e1
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse3host
Outcome: pathogenicitye0
Direction: comparablee0
Qualifier: in both nitrogen regimese0
Comparator: wild-typee2

Verbatim

e0
“However, total protein content in galls and pathogenicity were comparable between fungal genotypes in both nitrogen regimes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1289

e1
“Δnit2 leaf galls”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1008

e2
“wild-type galls”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1163

e3
“corn smut fungus Ustilago maydis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–263

Title

Ustilago maydis Nit2 Regulates Nitrate Utilisation During Biotrophy and Affects Amino Acid Metabolism of Galls Under Nitrogen Depletion

Philipp L. Lopinski; Christin Schulz; Alicia Fischer; et al. Molecular Plant Pathology 2025. doi:10.1111/mpp.70148

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pennycress seedlings were unable to compete with corn for available light resources.

Taxon: Pennycresse0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse0other
Outcome: unable to compete with corn for available light resourcese0

Verbatim

e0
“Pennycress seedlings were unable to compete with corn for available light resources”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1037

Title

Stover removal has minimal impact on pennycress seeded into standing corn

Julija A. Cubins; Samantha Wells; Gregg A. Johnson; et al. Crop Science 2024. doi:10.1002/csc2.21242

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 groundnut–corn ratio reduced groundnut yield to 67.5 grams per plant versus 119.2 grams under sole cropping.

Taxon: groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: 1:1 ratioe0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0othere0
Outcome: groundnut yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 67.5 grams per plante0
Comparator: sole croppinge0

Verbatim

e0
“Results indicated that intercropping significantly reduced groundnut yield due to resource competition, with yields of 67.5 grams per plant in the 1:1 ratio and 70.6 grams in the 1:2 ratio, compared to 119.2 grams in sole cropping.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–644

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110

Title

Yield prediction and optimization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under multiple cropping systems with corn (Zea mays L.)

Edi Wiraguna; Agief Julio Pratama; Muhammad Iqbal Nurulhaq; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2024. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202457702022

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect The 1:2 ratio reduced groundnut yield to 70.6 grams versus 119.2 grams under sole cropping.
Association Groundnut yield was positively associated with pod number and fresh biomass.
Association Groundnut yield was negatively correlated with leaf count.
Method / resource Predicted and actual groundnut yields did not differ significantly.
Recommendation The authors considered the 1:1 ratio more effective for maintaining yield in intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 ratio reduced groundnut yield to 70.6 grams versus 119.2 grams under sole cropping.

Taxon: groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: 1:2 ratioe0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0othere0
Outcome: groundnut yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 70.6 gramse0
Comparator: sole croppinge0

Verbatim

e0
“Results indicated that intercropping significantly reduced groundnut yield due to resource competition, with yields of 67.5 grams per plant in the 1:1 ratio and 70.6 grams in the 1:2 ratio, compared to 119.2 grams in sole cropping.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–644

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110

Title

Yield prediction and optimization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under multiple cropping systems with corn (Zea mays L.)

Edi Wiraguna; Agief Julio Pratama; Muhammad Iqbal Nurulhaq; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2024. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202457702022

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect The 1:1 groundnut–corn ratio reduced groundnut yield to 67.5 grams per plant versus 119.2 grams under sole cropping.
Association Groundnut yield was positively associated with pod number and fresh biomass.
Association Groundnut yield was negatively correlated with leaf count.
Method / resource Predicted and actual groundnut yields did not differ significantly.
Recommendation The authors considered the 1:1 ratio more effective for maintaining yield in intercropping.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both johnsongrass populations produced more aboveground biomass with corn than sunflower.

Taxon: johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0
Interactor: cornZea mays subsp. mayse0other
Outcome: aboveground biomasse0
Direction: moree0
Comparator: sunflowerse0

Verbatim

e0
“Both populations grown with corn produced more aboveground biomass than the ones grown with sunflowers.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1351

t0
“Johnsongrass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75

Title

Comparison of Molecularly Identified Resistant and Susceptible Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.) Populations at ALS Gene, in the Absence and Presence of Field Crops

Aristeidis P. Papapanagiotou; Eleni A. Anthimidou; Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos; et al. Genes 2024. doi:10.3390/genes15111415

Other claims from this paper (6)

Zea mays subsp. mays 262 claims

262 claims