Paper · 2025 · Bulletin of KSAU

BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PROTECTION MEANS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE EASTERN CORN BORER (OSTRINIA FURNACALIS GUENEE, 1854)

Ol'ga Telichko; Elena Lastushkina; Oksana Syrmolot

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the biological effectiveness of preparations (insecticides) against the eastern corn borer (Ostrinia furnacalis Guenee, 1854) and to assess their impact on the seed productivity of corn. The study was conducted in the fields of the laboratory of selection and primary seed production of corn of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnology of the Far East named after A.K. Chaika in 2023–2024. The effectiveness was assessed: biological preparations – Biokill, KE (abamectin, 10 g/l), and Proclaim, VRG (emamectin benzoate, 50 g/kg); chemical – Espero, KS (imidacloprid,, 200 g/l + alpha-cypermethrin, 120 g/l) and Proteus, MD (thiacloprid, 100 g/l + deltamethrin, 10 g/l). Experimental design: 1 – control (treatment with distilled water); 2 – Proteus (0.5 l/ha, single treatment); 3 – Proteus (0.5 l/ha, double treatment); 4 – Biokill (0.4 l/ha, single treatment); 5 – Biokill (0.4 l/ha, double treatment); 6 – Espero (0.15 l/ha, single treatment); 7 – Espero (0.15 l/ha, double treatment); 8 – Proclaim (0.3 kg/ha, single treatment); 9 – Proclaim (0.3 kg/ha, double treatment). Plot area is 10.5 m2. Placement is systematic. Replication is threefold. Corn variety is Slavyanka. Observations and records were made in accordance with generally accepted me-thods. The preparation Proteus has a high biological efficiency against the pest with two-fold treatment of plants – 82 %, the bioinsecticide Biokill has the minimum with a single use (52 %). A positive effect of all the studied preparations on the seed productivity of corn was revealed. A significant increase (26.8 g, HCP05 = 15.4) in grain per 1 cob and the weight of 1000 grains (98 g, HCP05 = 19.0) compared to the control is provided by the insecticide Proteus with two-fold application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteus with two treatments had 82% biological efficiency against the pest.

Taxon
Ostrinia furnacalisOstrinia furnacalise1
Treatment
Proteuse0
Interactor
cornZea mays subsp. mayse2host
Outcome
biological efficiencye0
Direction
highe0
Value
82 %e0
Qualifier
two-fold treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ostrinia furnacalis
Ostrinia furnacalis · TaxonKembangraps · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · InteractorDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preparation Proteus has a high biological efficiency against the pest with two-fold treatment of plants – 82 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1468 · show in text ↑
e1

“eastern corn borer (Ostrinia furnacalis Guenee, 1854)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“to assess their impact on the seed productivity of corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biokill with a single use had the minimum efficiency, 52%.

Taxon
Ostrinia furnacalisOstrinia furnacalise1
Treatment
Biokille0
Outcome
minimume0
Direction
minimume0
Value
52 %e0
Qualifier
single usee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ostrinia furnacalis
Ostrinia furnacalis · TaxonKembangraps · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bioinsecticide Biokill has the minimum with a single use (52 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1538 · show in text ↑
e1

“eastern corn borer (Ostrinia furnacalis Guenee, 1854)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteus positively affected corn seed productivity.

Treatment
Proteuse1
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of all the studied preparations on the seed productivity of corn was revealed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1635 · show in text ↑
e1

“2 – Proteus (0.5 l/ha, single treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biokill positively affected corn seed productivity.

Treatment
Biokille1
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of all the studied preparations on the seed productivity of corn was revealed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1635 · show in text ↑
e1

“4 – Biokill (0.4 l/ha, single treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Espero positively affected corn seed productivity.

Treatment
Esperoe1
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of all the studied preparations on the seed productivity of corn was revealed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1635 · show in text ↑
e1

“6 – Espero (0.15 l/ha, single treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proclaim positively affected corn seed productivity.

Treatment
Proclaime1
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of all the studied preparations on the seed productivity of corn was revealed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1635 · show in text ↑
e1

“8 – Proclaim (0.3 kg/ha, single treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Proteus applications significantly increased grain per cob by 26.8 g versus control.

Treatment
Proteuse0
Outcome
grain per 1 cobe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.8 ge0
Qualifier
two-fold applicatione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase (26.8 g, HCP05 = 15.4) in grain per 1 cob and the weight of 1000 grains (98 g, HCP05 = 19.0) compared to the control is provided by the insecticide Proteus with two-fold application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess their impact on the seed productivity of corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Proteus applications significantly increased 1000-grain weight by 98 g versus control.

Treatment
Proteuse0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
98 ge0
Qualifier
two-fold applicatione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase (26.8 g, HCP05 = 15.4) in grain per 1 cob and the weight of 1000 grains (98 g, HCP05 = 19.0) compared to the control is provided by the insecticide Proteus with two-fold application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess their impact on the seed productivity of corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–223 · show in text ↑

emamectin benzoate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.