Paper · 2024 · E3S Web of Conferences

Yield prediction and optimization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under multiple cropping systems with corn (Zea mays L.)

Edi Wiraguna; Agief Julio Pratama; Muhammad Iqbal Nurulhaq; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explores the impact of multiple cropping on groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L .) yield when intercropped with corn ( Zea mays L .) at different ratios (1:1 and 1:2) compared to sole cropping. The study aimed to evaluate yield differences and the correlation between yield and morpho-agronomic traits. The experiment was conducted over two growing seasons (2022-2023) at the Agricultural Research Station. Results indicated that intercropping significantly reduced groundnut yield due to resource competition, with yields of 67.5 grams per plant in the 1:1 ratio and 70.6 grams in the 1:2 ratio, compared to 119.2 grams in sole cropping. Correlation analysis showed that yield was positively associated with pod number and fresh biomass but negatively correlated with leaf count. A predictive model for groundnut yield (2024-2026) was developed and validated, showing no significant difference between predicted and actual yields. The findings suggest that the 1:1 ratio is more effective in maintaining yield under multiple cropping systems and optimizing intercropping strategies to enhance agricultural productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 groundnut–corn ratio reduced groundnut yield to 67.5 grams per plant versus 119.2 grams under sole cropping.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
1:1 ratioe0
Interactor
cornZea mays subsp. mayst0othere0
Outcome
groundnut yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67.5 grams per plante0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · InteractorDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that intercropping significantly reduced groundnut yield due to resource competition, with yields of 67.5 grams per plant in the 1:1 ratio and 70.6 grams in the 1:2 ratio, compared to 119.2 grams in sole cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 ratio reduced groundnut yield to 70.6 grams versus 119.2 grams under sole cropping.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
1:2 ratioe0
Interactor
cornZea mays subsp. mayst0othere0
Outcome
groundnut yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70.6 gramse0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · InteractorDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that intercropping significantly reduced groundnut yield due to resource competition, with yields of 67.5 grams per plant in the 1:1 ratio and 70.6 grams in the 1:2 ratio, compared to 119.2 grams in sole cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut yield was positively associated with pod number and fresh biomass.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
pod number and fresh biomasse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positively associatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation analysis showed that yield was positively associated with pod number and fresh biomass but negatively correlated with leaf count.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut yield was negatively correlated with leaf count.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
leaf counte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation analysis showed that yield was positively associated with pod number and fresh biomass but negatively correlated with leaf count.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted and actual groundnut yields did not differ significantly.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
groundnut yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
2024-2026e0
Comparator
actual yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A predictive model for groundnut yield (2024-2026) was developed and validated, showing no significant difference between predicted and actual yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–937 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered the 1:1 ratio more effective for maintaining yield in intercropping.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
1:1 ratioe0
Outcome
maintaining yielde0
Direction
more effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings suggest that the 1:1 ratio is more effective in maintaining yield under multiple cropping systems and optimizing intercropping strategies to enhance agricultural productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑