Abstract
The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield,1000-grain weight,grain protein content,fat content,and starch content with five mulching treatments and seven treatments of harvesting time. The results showed that optimal harvest time significantly increased yield and grain quality of maize. With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%. Although starch content was reduced by 0. 5% ~ 4. 9%,its yield was increased by 340 ~ 773 kg·hm- 2. Extending harvest time to 15 days showed a significant increase in yield and grain quality of spring maize in Loess Plateau,but its effect varied with mulching patterns.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest by 15 days increased maize yield by 10.19% to 15.62%.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%e1
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest by 15 days increased 1000-grain weight by 10.19% to 15.62%.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weighte1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest by 15 days increased grain protein content by 0.26% to 1.29%.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- grain protein contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest by 15 days increased protein yield by 117 to 230 kg/hm2.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- protein yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest by 15 days increased fat content by 0.05% to 0.40%.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- fat contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest reduced starch content by 0.5% to 4.9%.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- starch contente3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 0. 5% ~ 4. 9%e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
e3“Although starch content was reduced by 0. 5% ~ 4. 9%,its yield was increased by 340 ~ 773 kg·hm- 2”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest increased starch yield by 340 to 773 kg/hm2.
- Treatment
- delay of harvest time by 15 dayse1
- Outcome
- its yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 340 ~ 773 kg·hm- 2e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study aims to investigate the effect of delayed harvesting on spring maize yield”
e1“With the delay of harvest time by 15 days,yield was increased by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,1000-grain weight by 10. 19% ~ 15. 62%,grain protein content by 0. 26% ~ 1. 29%,and protein yield by 117 ~ 230 kg ·hm- 2,and fat content by 0. 05% ~ 0. 40%”
e3“Although starch content was reduced by 0. 5% ~ 4. 9%,its yield was increased by 340 ~ 773 kg·hm- 2”
Claim · model-written summary
Extending harvest to 15 days significantly increased yield and grain quality of spring maize in the Loess Plateau, and the effect varied with mulching pattern.
- Treatment
- Extending harvest time to 15 dayse4
- Outcome
- yield and grain qualitye4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Qualifier
- its effect varied with mulching patternse4
- Setting
- Loess Plateaue4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Extending harvest time to 15 days showed a significant increase in yield and grain quality of spring maize in Loess Plateau,but its effect varied with mulching patterns”
The same questions in other papers
harvest time · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
harvest time · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
harvest time · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →harvest time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.