Paper · 2006 · Experimental Agriculture

SUSTAINABLE MAIZE PRODUCTION USING GLIRICIDIA/MAIZE INTERCROPPING IN SOUTHERN MALAWI

F. K. AKINNIFESI; W. MAKUMBA; F. R. KWESIGA

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
100
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize production in Malawi is limited by high costs and sub-optimal use of chemical fertilizers under continuous cultivation. A long-term gliricidia/maize trial was undertaken on a Ferric Lixisol from 1991/92 to 2001/02. The purpose of the study was to assess the performance of a gliricidia/maize intercropping system as a low-input soil fertility replenishment option in southern Malawi. The experiment was a 2 × 3 × 3 factorial design with three replications. Treatments included two maize cropping systems (with and without gliricidia trees), and three rates of inorganic N fertilizer (0, 24 and 48 N kg ha −1 representing 0, 25 and 50% of the national recommended N rate), and three rates of P fertilizer application (0, 20 and 40 P ha −1 representing 0, 50 and 100% of the recommended rate). No effect of P was detected on yield early in the trial, and this treatment was discontinued. The gliricidia pruning biomass did not decline after 10 years of intensive pruning, with strong correlation between tree biomass production and years after establishment ( r = 0.91, p < 0.001). Application of gliricidia prunings increased maize yields by three times compared to the yield of unfertilized sole maize. Maize yield from the unfertilized gliricidia pruning treatment was superior to the yield from sole maize supplemented with a quarter or half the recommended N rate. The study confirmed that a gliricidia/maize intercropping system is a promising soil fertility replenishment option in southern Malawi and elsewhere in southern Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of gliricidia prunings increased maize yield by three times compared with unfertilized sole maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Application of gliricidia pruningse1
Outcome
maize yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
three timese1
Comparator
unfertilized sole maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of gliricidia prunings increased maize yields by three times compared to the yield of unfertilized sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield from unfertilized gliricidia pruning treatment was superior to sole maize with a quarter or half the recommended N rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
unfertilized gliricidia pruning treatmente2
Outcome
Maize yielde2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
sole maize supplemented with a quarter or half the recommended N ratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maize yield from the unfertilized gliricidia pruning treatment was superior to the yield from sole maize supplemented with a quarter or half the recommended N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1372 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia pruning biomass did not decline after 10 years of intensive pruning.

Taxon
gliricidiaGliricidiae1
Outcome
gliricidia pruning biomasse1
Direction
did not declinee1
Qualifier
after 10 years of intensive pruninge1
Setting
SOUTHERN MALAWIt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia
Gliricidia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Atamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUSTAINABLE MAIZE PRODUCTION USING GLIRICIDIA/MAIZE INTERCROPPING IN SOUTHERN MALAWI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The gliricidia pruning biomass did not decline after 10 years of intensive pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree biomass production was strongly correlated with years after establishment (r = 0.91, p < 0.001).

Taxon
gliricidiaGliricidiae1
Outcome
tree biomass productione2
Value
r = 0.91, p < 0.001e2
Qualifier
strong correlatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia
Gliricidia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Atamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The gliricidia pruning biomass did not decline after 10 years of intensive pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–974 · show in text ↑
e2

“with strong correlation between tree biomass production and years after establishment ( r = 0.91, p < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1084 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study indicates that gliricidia/maize intercropping is a promising soil fertility replenishment option in southern Malawi and southern Africa.

Taxon
gliricidia/maizeZea maysGliricidiae4
Outcome
soil fertility replenishment optione4
Setting
southern Malawie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gliricidia
Gliricidia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Atamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUSTAINABLE MAIZE PRODUCTION USING GLIRICIDIA/MAIZE INTERCROPPING IN SOUTHERN MALAWI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“The study confirmed that a gliricidia/maize intercropping system is a promising soil fertility replenishment option in southern Malawi and elsewhere in southern Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No effect of P fertilizer on maize yield was detected early in the trial.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Pe5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
No effecte5
Qualifier
early in the triale5
Setting
SOUTHERN MALAWIt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUSTAINABLE MAIZE PRODUCTION USING GLIRICIDIA/MAIZE INTERCROPPING IN SOUTHERN MALAWI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e5

“No effect of P was detected on yield early in the trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–853 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.