Abstract
This study evaluated the performance of tree legumes and other soil fertility management innovations used by farmers. The objectives of the study were to: examine the extent that farm attributes, typology of farmers and field management practices have affected the adaptation and use of agroforestry technologies for soil fertility management and compare the agronomic performance and farmer assessment of agroforestry and other soil fertility management options, across a wide range of farmer types and field conditions, with a view to establishing the contribution of management variables to variations in yield estimation. Maize yield and farmer rating were assessed in Type II (researcher-designed, farmer-managed), Type III (farmer-designed and managed) trials and extension farmers. Results from 152 farmers show that agroforestry increased the yield of maize by 54-76% compared to unfertilized sole maize used as the control. When amended with fertilizer, the yield increase over the control was 73-76% across tree species. This indicates that farmers who had combined agroforestry with inorganic fertilizer experienced increase in maize yield attributable to the synergy between organic and inorganic fertilizer. In gliricidia-maize intercropping, higher maize yield was obtained by farmers who pruned twice. Combination of two prunings and fertilizer use gave the highest yield increase (148%) over the control and the third pruning was superfluous when fertilizer was applied. Without fertilizer, maize yield in agroforestry plots intercropped with pigeon pea was higher than those plots without pigeon pea. Planting date, fertilizer application, use of agroforestry and maize variety explained about 44% of the variation in maize yield on farmers fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry increased maize yield 54-76% versus unfertilized sole maize.
- Treatment
- agroforestrye0
- Outcome
- yield of maizee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 54-76%e0
- Comparator
- unfertilized sole maizee0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“agroforestry increased the yield of maize by 54-76% compared to unfertilized sole maize used as the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer-amended agroforestry increased maize yield 73-76% versus control across tree species.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When amended with fertilizer, the yield increase over the control was 73-76% across tree species”
t0“On-Farm Assessment of Legume Fallows and Other Soil Fertility Management Options Used by Smallholder Farmers in Southern Malawi”
e7“the yield of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning twice gave higher maize yield in gliricidia-maize intercropping.
- Treatment
- pruned twicee0
- Interactor
- gliricidia
Gliricidiae0other - Outcome
- maize yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In gliricidia-maize intercropping, higher maize yield was obtained by farmers who pruned twice”
Claim · model-written summary
Two prunings plus fertilizer gave the highest maize yield increase of 148% versus control.
- Treatment
- two prunings and fertilizer usee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 148%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combination of two prunings and fertilizer use gave the highest yield increase (148%) over the control”
t0“On-Farm Assessment of Legume Fallows and Other Soil Fertility Management Options Used by Smallholder Farmers in Southern Malawi”
e7“the yield of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
A third pruning was superfluous when fertilizer was applied.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the third pruning was superfluous when fertilizer was applied”
t0“On-Farm Assessment of Legume Fallows and Other Soil Fertility Management Options Used by Smallholder Farmers in Southern Malawi”
e7“the yield of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Without fertilizer, pigeon pea intercropping raised maize yield relative to plots without pigeon pea.
- Treatment
- intercropped with pigeon peae0
- Interactor
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- maize yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- Without fertilizere0
- Comparator
- without pigeon peae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Without fertilizer, maize yield in agroforestry plots intercropped with pigeon pea was higher than those plots without pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting date, fertilizer, agroforestry, and variety explained about 44% of maize yield variation.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Planting date, fertilizer application, use of agroforestry and maize variety explained about 44% of the variation in maize yield on farmers fields”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.