Abstract
(33.44%), dry matter yield (17.68 t ha -1 ) and green fodder yield (71.32 t ha -1 ) were significantly increased with nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 . Among nitrogen input rates, 150 kg N ha -1 level was also responsible for highest crude fat (3.09%), crude protein (11.48%) and crude fiber (34.21%) except ash contents (10.17%) compared to other nitrogen treatments. Twenty days delayed for harvest proved to be best for increasing growth and quality characters of maize plants. The interaction between nitrogen rates and harvest dates was found to be highly significant except for plant height, dry matter percentage and crude protein. Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3) significantly improved the stem diameter (5.11 cm), leaf area plant -1 (4108 cm 2 ), dry matter yield (21.35 t ha -1 ), green fodder yield (83.87 t ha -1 ) and crude fiber (37.21%) while crude fat (2.47%) and ash (9.17%) contents were decreased. In conclusion, on the basis of growth and quality parameters, the nitrogen application at 150 kg N ha -1 and harvesting time (70 DAS) was the suitable option to attain highest
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 150 kg N ha -1 significantly increased dry matter yield to 17.68 t ha -1.
- Treatment
- nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 17.68 t ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“dry matter yield (17.68 t ha -1 ) and green fodder yield (71.32 t ha -1 ) were significantly increased with nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 150 kg N ha -1 significantly increased green fodder yield to 71.32 t ha -1.
- Treatment
- nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 71.32 t ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“dry matter yield (17.68 t ha -1 ) and green fodder yield (71.32 t ha -1 ) were significantly increased with nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1”
Claim · model-written summary
At 150 kg N ha -1 crude fat was highest at 3.09%.
- Treatment
- 150 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- crude fate0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.09%e0
- Comparator
- other nitrogen treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“150 kg N ha -1 level was also responsible for highest crude fat (3.09%), crude protein (11.48%) and crude fiber (34.21%) except ash contents (10.17%) compared to other nitrogen treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
At 150 kg N ha -1 crude protein was highest at 11.48%.
- Treatment
- 150 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- crude proteine0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 11.48%e0
- Comparator
- other nitrogen treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“150 kg N ha -1 level was also responsible for highest crude fat (3.09%), crude protein (11.48%) and crude fiber (34.21%) except ash contents (10.17%) compared to other nitrogen treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
At 150 kg N ha -1 crude fiber was highest at 34.21%.
- Treatment
- 150 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- crude fibere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 34.21%e0
- Comparator
- other nitrogen treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“150 kg N ha -1 level was also responsible for highest crude fat (3.09%), crude protein (11.48%) and crude fiber (34.21%) except ash contents (10.17%) compared to other nitrogen treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
At 150 kg N ha -1 ash content was 10.17% but was an exception to the highest quality values.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“except ash contents (10.17%) compared to other nitrogen treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
A 20 day harvest delay best increased maize growth and quality traits.
- Treatment
- Twenty days delayed for harveste0
- Outcome
- growth and quality characterse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Twenty days delayed for harvest proved to be best for increasing growth and quality characters of maize plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate and harvest date interacted significantly for most traits, except plant height, dry matter percentage and crude protein.
- Treatment
- nitrogen ratese0
- Outcome
- interaction between nitrogen rates and harvest datese0
- Qualifier
- except for plant height, dry matter percentage and crude proteine0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“The interaction between nitrogen rates and harvest dates was found to be highly significant except for plant height, dry matter percentage and crude protein”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved stem diameter to 5.11 cm.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- stem diametere0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 5.11 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3) significantly improved the stem diameter (5.11 cm), leaf area plant -1 (4108 cm 2 ), dry matter yield (21.35 t ha -1 ), green fodder yield (83.87 t ha -1 ) and crude fiber (37.21%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved leaf area to 4108 cm 2.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- leaf area plant -1e0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 4108 cm 2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3) significantly improved the stem diameter (5.11 cm), leaf area plant -1 (4108 cm 2 ), dry matter yield (21.35 t ha -1 ), green fodder yield (83.87 t ha -1 ) and crude fiber (37.21%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved dry matter yield to 21.35 t ha -1.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 21.35 t ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3) significantly improved the stem diameter (5.11 cm), leaf area plant -1 (4108 cm 2 ), dry matter yield (21.35 t ha -1 ), green fodder yield (83.87 t ha -1 ) and crude fiber (37.21%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved green fodder yield to 83.87 t ha -1.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 83.87 t ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3) significantly improved the stem diameter (5.11 cm), leaf area plant -1 (4108 cm 2 ), dry matter yield (21.35 t ha -1 ), green fodder yield (83.87 t ha -1 ) and crude fiber (37.21%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved crude fiber to 37.21%.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- crude fibere0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 37.21%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3) significantly improved the stem diameter (5.11 cm), leaf area plant -1 (4108 cm 2 ), dry matter yield (21.35 t ha -1 ), green fodder yield (83.87 t ha -1 ) and crude fiber (37.21%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment decreased crude fat to 2.47%.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- crude fate1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 2.47%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3)”
e1“while crude fat (2.47%) and ash (9.17%) contents were decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment decreased ash to 9.17%.
- Treatment
- Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest datee0
- Outcome
- ashe1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 9.17%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Nitrogen input of 150 kg N ha -1 with 70 DAS harvest date (N3 × H3)”
e1“while crude fat (2.47%) and ash (9.17%) contents were decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 150 kg N ha -1 and harvest at 70 DAS to maximize fodder growth and quality.
- Outcome
- nitrogen application at 150 kg N ha -1 and harvesting time (70 DAS)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“on the basis of growth and quality parameters, the nitrogen application at 150 kg N ha -1 and harvesting time (70 DAS) was the suitable option to attain highest”
The same questions in other papers
harvest time · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →harvest time · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →harvest time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
177 papers more in this group
See all 181 papers →nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
744 papers more in this group
See all 748 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.