Claim · model-written summary
Urea coating technologies did not influence maize crude protein concentration.
- Treatment
- technologies of urea coatinge0
- Outcome
- crude protein concentratione0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The crude protein concentration in maize was not influenced by the technologies of urea coating.”
Title
Loss of ammonia from nitrogen fertilizers applied to maize and soybean straw
Letícia de Abreu Faria; Carlos Antonio Costa do Nascimento; Godofredo Cesar Vitti; et al. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2013. doi:10.1590/s0100-06832013000400014
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation Ammonia nitrogen volatilization was greatest in the first four days after fertilizer application.
- Intervention effect Copper sulfate and boric acid coated urea had the lowest ammonia loss among urea sources under favorable volatilization conditions.
- Intervention effect Under high rainfall, ammonia losses from the urea sources were similar.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application affected maize grain yield only in the 2009/2010 maize residue season.
- Intervention effect The ammonium plus coated urea combination optimized grain yield relative to other urea treatments.