Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Urea coating technologies did not influence maize crude protein concentration.

A claim from Loss of ammonia from nitrogen fertilizers applied to maize and soybean straw · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea coating technologies did not influence maize crude protein concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
technologies of urea coatinge0
Outcome
crude protein concentratione0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude protein concentration in maize was not influenced by the technologies of urea coating.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1733

Title

Loss of ammonia from nitrogen fertilizers applied to maize and soybean straw

Letícia de Abreu Faria; Carlos Antonio Costa do Nascimento; Godofredo Cesar Vitti; et al. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2013. doi:10.1590/s0100-06832013000400014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-baf42e2be5cda7167b94d06aa75f82b45ad6a6e458b11a09e4606a7984dd6060 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

storage · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative
See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

181 papers: 164 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 164 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 181 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.