Paper · 2013 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Loss of ammonia from nitrogen fertilizers applied to maize and soybean straw

Letícia de Abreu Faria; Carlos Antonio Costa do Nascimento; Godofredo Cesar Vitti; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Brazilian agriculture, urea is the most commonly used nitrogen (N) source, in spite of having the disadvantage of losing considerable amounts of N by ammonia-N volatilization. The objectives of this study were to evaluate: N lossby ammonia volatilization from: [urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid], [urea coated with zeolite], [urea+ammonium sulfate], [urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid+ammonium sulfate], [common urea] and [ammonium nitrate]; and the effect of these N source son the maize yield in terms of amount and quality. The treatments were applied to the surface of a soil under no-tillage maize, in two growing seasons. The first season (2009/2010) was after a maize crop (maize straw left on the soil surface) and the second cycle (2012/2011) after a soybean crop. Due to the weather conditions during the experiments, the volatilization of ammonia-N was highest in the first four days after application of the N sources. Of all urea sources, under volatilization-favorable conditions, the loss of ammonia from urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid was lowest, while under high rainfall, the losses from the different urea sources was similar, i.e., an adequate rainfall was favorablet o reduce volatilization. The ammonia volatilization losses were greatest in the first four days after application. Maize grain yield differed due to N application and in the treatments, but this was only observed with cultivation of maize crop residues in 2009/2010. The combination of ammonium+urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid optimized grain yield compared to the other urea treatments. The crude protein concentration in maize was not influenced by the technologies of urea coating.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia nitrogen volatilization was greatest in the first four days after fertilizer application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
volatilization of ammonia-Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
first four days after applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the volatilization of ammonia-N was highest in the first four days after application of the N sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulfate and boric acid coated urea had the lowest ammonia loss among urea sources under favorable volatilization conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acide0
Outcome
loss of ammoniae0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
volatilization-favorable conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under volatilization-favorable conditions, the loss of ammonia from urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid was lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high rainfall, ammonia losses from the urea sources were similar.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
different urea sourcese0
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
high rainfalle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high rainfall, the losses from the different urea sources was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application affected maize grain yield only in the 2009/2010 maize residue season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
differede0
Qualifier
maize crop residues in 2009/2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yield differed due to N application and in the treatments, but this was only observed with cultivation of maize crop residues in 2009/2010.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ammonium plus coated urea combination optimized grain yield relative to other urea treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ammonium+urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acide0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
optimizede0
Comparator
other urea treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of ammonium+urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid optimized grain yield compared to the other urea treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1636 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea coating technologies did not influence maize crude protein concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
technologies of urea coatinge0
Outcome
crude protein concentratione0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude protein concentration in maize was not influenced by the technologies of urea coating.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1733 · show in text ↑

copper(II) sulfate · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

copper(II) sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 95 positive, 47 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

181 papers: 164 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 164 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

177 papers more in this group

See all 181 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.