Paper · 2010 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of rice (Oryza sativa) straw mulching on the performance of rapeseed (Brassica campestris) varieties in rice-rapeseed cropping system.

S. K. Sarangi; U. S. Saikia; T.D. Lama

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Meghalaya, during 2006–08 to study the effect of rice straw mulching on growth, yield attributes and yield of different rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) varieties, namely ‘M 27’, ‘TS 38’ and ‘Sikkim Sarson’. The plant height of rapeseed increased by 7.2% at harvest due to rice straw mulching @ 5.0 tonnes/ha over the non-mulching and it was highest (96.88 cm) in ‘TS 38’. Lower values (–2.9°C) of canopy air temperature difference were recorded in the mulch treatment than under control (–2.3°C). Mulching resulted in storage of 2.0% more soil moisture in the root zone of the crop over the unmulched control, indicating better microclimate for crop growth and development. Leaf area index was higher in ‘TS 38’ and in mulching treatment. Number of siliquae/plant (24.6%), seeds/siliqua (17.6%) and seed yield (35.4%) increased due to mulching over the non-mulching. The varieties differed significantly with respect to 100-seed weight and it was highest (0.37 g) in ‘TS 38’. Highest seed yield was obtained in ‘TS 38’ (1.51 tonnes/ha), followed by ‘M 27’ (1.46 tonnes/ha) and significantly superior over the ‘Sikkim Sarson’ (0.97 tonnes/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch increased rapeseed height by 7.2% at harvest.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
rice straw mulching @ 5.0 tonnes/hae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.2%e0
Comparator
non-mulchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of rapeseed increased by 7.2% at harvest due to rice straw mulching @ 5.0 tonnes/ha over the non-mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS 38 had the highest plant height, 96.88 cm.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
TS 38e0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Value
96.88 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“it was highest (96.88 cm) in ‘TS 38’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy air temperature difference was lower under mulch than control.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
mulch treatmente0
Outcome
canopy air temperature differencee0
Direction
Lowere0
Value
–2.9°Ce0
Qualifier
–2.3°Ce0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Lower values (–2.9°C) of canopy air temperature difference were recorded in the mulch treatment than under control (–2.3°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased root-zone soil moisture by 2.0%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
moree0
Value
2.0%e0
Comparator
unmulched controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching resulted in storage of 2.0% more soil moisture in the root zone of the crop over the unmulched control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index was higher in TS 38.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
TS 38e0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index was higher in ‘TS 38’ and in mulching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased leaf area index.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
mulching treatmente0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index was higher in ‘TS 38’ and in mulching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased siliquae per plant by 24.6%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
Number of siliquae/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.6%e0
Comparator
non-mulchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Number of siliquae/plant (24.6%), seeds/siliqua (17.6%) and seed yield (35.4%) increased due to mulching over the non-mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased seeds per siliqua by 17.6%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
seeds/siliquae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.6%e0
Comparator
non-mulchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Number of siliquae/plant (24.6%), seeds/siliqua (17.6%) and seed yield (35.4%) increased due to mulching over the non-mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased seed yield by 35.4%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.4%e0
Comparator
non-mulchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Number of siliquae/plant (24.6%), seeds/siliqua (17.6%) and seed yield (35.4%) increased due to mulching over the non-mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed significantly in 100-seed weight, highest in TS 38 at 0.37 g.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
TS 38e0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.37 ge0

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties differed significantly with respect to 100-seed weight and it was highest (0.37 g) in ‘TS 38’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS 38 had the highest yield at 1.51 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
TS 38e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1.51 tonnes/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Highest seed yield was obtained in ‘TS 38’ (1.51 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M 27 yielded 1.46 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
M 27e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1.46 tonnes/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“followed by ‘M 27’ (1.46 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sikkim Sarson yielded 0.97 tonnes/ha, significantly below the other varieties.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
Sikkim Sarsone0
Outcome
Sikkim Sarsone0
Direction
superior overe0
Value
0.97 tonnes/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“significantly superior over the ‘Sikkim Sarson’ (0.97 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

organic · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.