Abstract
The effectiveness of organic root plus (biostimulant) was compared with conventional fertilizer on the growth and yield of amaranthus in a glass house study. The treatments consisted of control, full rate each of biostimulant and fertilizer, and combination of fertilizer with biostimulant at full and half rates. The urea, single super-phosphate and muriate of potash were applied at 100 kg N, 60 kg P2O5 and 30 kg K/ha (fertilizer full rate) respectively, while biostimulant was applied at the rate of 40 litres/ha. The results obtained showed that the use of organic biostimulant alone was not as effective as that of fertilizer alone in most of the parameters considered. The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant. Complimentary application of biostimulant with mineral fertilizer promoted the vegetative growth, nutrient composition, root development and yield of amaranthus. When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer. The combinations of the two materials at various ratios were also effective.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant alone was less effective than fertilizer alone for most measured parameters.
- Taxon
- amaranthus
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=60)
Amaranthust0 - Treatment
- organic biostimulant alonee0
- Outcome
- most of the parameters considerede0
- Direction
- not as effectivee0
- Comparator
- fertilizer alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the use of organic biostimulant alone was not as effective as that of fertilizer alone in most of the parameters considered”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional fertilizer increased number of leaves by 38% in first cycle versus biostimulant alone.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- conventional fertilizere0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 38e0
- Comparator
- sole use of biostimulante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional fertilizer increased number of leaves by 82% in regeneration versus biostimulant alone.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- conventional fertilizere0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 82e0
- Comparator
- sole use of biostimulante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional fertilizer increased plant height by 19% in first cycle versus biostimulant alone.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- conventional fertilizere0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 19e0
- Comparator
- sole use of biostimulante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional fertilizer increased plant height by 73% in regeneration versus biostimulant alone.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- conventional fertilizere0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 73e0
- Comparator
- sole use of biostimulante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional fertilizer increased leaf area by 35% in first cycle versus biostimulant alone.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- conventional fertilizere0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 35e0
- Comparator
- sole use of biostimulante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional fertilizer increased leaf area by 3% in regeneration versus biostimulant alone.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- conventional fertilizere0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 3e0
- Comparator
- sole use of biostimulante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The conventional fertilizer had percentages increases of 38 and 82, 19 and 73, 35 and 3, in number of leaves, plant height and leaf area in the first cycle and regeneration, respectively, over the sole use of biostimulant”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining biostimulant and mineral fertilizer promoted vegetative growth, nutrient composition, and root development.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthuse0
- Treatment
- Complimentary application of biostimulant with mineral fertilizere0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, nutrient composition, root developmente0
- Direction
- promotede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Complimentary application of biostimulant with mineral fertilizer promoted the vegetative growth, nutrient composition, root development and yield of amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased number of leaves by 15 in first cycle versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased number of leaves by 11% in regeneration versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 11%e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased plant height by 27 in first cycle versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased plant height by 14% in regeneration versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14%e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased leaf area by 7 in first cycle versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased leaf area by 5% in regeneration versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 5%e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased shoot yield by 15 in first cycle versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- first cyclee0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- shoot yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Full rate biostimulant plus fertilizer increased shoot yield by 15% in regeneration versus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Organ / stage
- regeneratione0
- Treatment
- full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- shoot yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15%e0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When full rate of biostimulant was combined with full rate of mineral fertilizers, the number of leaves, plant height, leaf area and shoot yield were increased 15 and 11%, 27 and 14%, 7 and 5%, 15 and 15%, in the first cycle and at regeneration, respectively, over the mineral fertilizer”
t0“amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Various other biostimulant and fertilizer ratios were also effective.
- Taxon
- amaranthusAmaranthust0
- Treatment
- combinations of the two materials at various ratiose0
- Outcome
- effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combinations of the two materials at various ratios were also effective”
t0“amaranthus”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · AmaranthusResults differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · yield · AmaranthusPositive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →other · quality: general · AmaranthusResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: general · AmaranthusResults agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →other · yield · AmaranthusResults agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →other · growth · AmaranthusResults agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.