Abstract
Some non-pathogenic rhizobacteria called Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) possess the capacity to induce defense mechanisms effective in plant against pathogens. The effect of Pseudomonas putida BTP1 on reproduction and development of phylloxera, which infested the roots of our local grape variety “Balady”, was evaluated. Our results showed that the life table of grape phylloxera was different between treated and control plants. The percentage of matured females, developmental time, fecundity and oviposition period were reduced when plants were treated with bacteria. The results showed that the phylloxera resistance was influenced by root soaking duration in P. putida BTP1 suspension. The present study provides good information on the possibility of using Pseudomonas putida BTP1 to increase the resistance of grape to phylloxera.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The grape phylloxera life table differed between treated and control plants.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- treatede0
- Interactor
- grape phylloxera
Daktulosphaira vitifoliaee0pest - Outcome
- life table of grape phylloxerae0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the life table of grape phylloxera was different between treated and control plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial treatment reduced the percentage of mature phylloxera females.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- treated with bacteriae0
- Interactor
- phylloxera
Phylloxerat0pest - Second interactor
- Pseudomonas putida BTP1
Pseudomonas putidat1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- percentage of matured femalese0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage of matured females, developmental time, fecundity and oviposition period were reduced when plants were treated with bacteria.”
t0“grape phylloxera”
t1“effect of Pseudomonas putida BTP1”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial treatment reduced phylloxera developmental time.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- treated with bacteriae0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerat0pest
- Outcome
- developmental timee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage of matured females, developmental time, fecundity and oviposition period were reduced when plants were treated with bacteria.”
t0“grape phylloxera”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial treatment reduced phylloxera fecundity.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- treated with bacteriae0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerat0pest
- Outcome
- fecunditye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage of matured females, developmental time, fecundity and oviposition period were reduced when plants were treated with bacteria.”
t0“grape phylloxera”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial treatment reduced phylloxera oviposition period.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- treated with bacteriae0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerat0pest
- Outcome
- oviposition periode0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage of matured females, developmental time, fecundity and oviposition period were reduced when plants were treated with bacteria.”
t0“grape phylloxera”
Claim · model-written summary
Root soaking duration in P. putida BTP1 suspension influenced phylloxera resistance.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- root soaking duration in P. putida BTP1 suspensione0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. putida BTP1Pseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- phylloxera resistancee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the phylloxera resistance was influenced by root soaking duration in P. putida BTP1 suspension.”
t0“grape”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Phylloxera · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.