Abstract
The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita was controlled more effectively and yields of host plants were greater when Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied together in field microplots than when either was applied alone. Yields of winter vetch from microplots inoculated with the nematode and with both organisms were not statistically different from yields from uninoculated control plots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans controlled Meloidogyne incognita more effectively than either alone.
- Taxon
- winter vetche1
- Treatment
- Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied togethere0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans
Purpureocillium lilacinumPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- Meloidogyne incognita was controllede0
- Direction
- more effectivelye0
- Comparator
- either was applied alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita was controlled more effectively and yields of host plants were greater when Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied together in field microplots than when either was applied alone.”
e1“Yields of winter vetch from microplots inoculated with the nematode”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined biocontrol organisms increased host plant yields compared with either alone.
- Taxon
- winter vetche1
- Treatment
- Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied togethere0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetransPurpureocillium lilacinumPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yields of host plantse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- either was applied alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita was controlled more effectively and yields of host plants were greater when Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied together in field microplots than when either was applied alone.”
e1“Yields of winter vetch from microplots inoculated with the nematode”
Claim · model-written summary
Winter vetch yield under nematode and combined organism inoculation was not statistically different from uninoculated controls.
Verbatim
e0“Yields of winter vetch from microplots inoculated with the nematode and with both organisms were not statistically different from yields from uninoculated control plots.”