Paper · 2013 · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)

Agronomic Traits and Physiology of Maize at Various Levels of Water Application

Hayatiningsih Gubali; S. M. Sitompul; Sudarto Sudarto; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Maize cultivation in Gorontalo Regency is commonly done in dry land, and this has made water as the main limiting factor for the excellent growth of the plant, as the plant often experiences water stress. This study was conducted to examine the agronomy traits and physiology of hybrid and composite maize on various water application levels. The study was done using a Split Plot Design in each with three repetitions. The main plots were for four different levels of water application: without water (A0), once water application (A1), twice water application (A2), and three-time water application (A3). The sub-plots were for the maize varieties, which consisted of two levels namely hybrid maize variety Bisi-2 (V1) and composite maize variety Bisma (V2). The results of the study show that three-time water application has helped increasing the height of the plants, the dry weight of the plants, as well as the dry weight of grains. Plants without water supply showed a decrease in the dry weight of the grains as much as 36 % compared to the plants with three-time water application. Three-time water application method on Bisi-2 variety showed the highest result and no water application on Bisma variety showed the lowest result. Water stress has caused production of Bisma variety 22 % lower than Bisi-2 variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-time water application increased plant height, plant dry weight and grain dry weight of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
three-time water applicatione0
Outcome
the height of the plants, the dry weight of the plants, as well as the dry weight of grainse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three-time water application has helped increasing the height of the plants, the dry weight of the plants, as well as the dry weight of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plants without water supply had grain dry weight decreased by 36 % compared with plants given three-time water application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
without water supplye0
Outcome
dry weight of the grainse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
36 %e0
Comparator
plants with three-time water applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants without water supply showed a decrease in the dry weight of the grains as much as 36 % compared to the plants with three-time water application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-time water application on the hybrid maize variety Bisi-2 gave the highest result.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Bisi-2e0
Treatment
Three-time water applicatione0
Outcome
highest resulte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three-time water application method on Bisi-2 variety showed the highest result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No water application on the composite maize variety Bisma gave the lowest result.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Bismae0
Treatment
no water applicatione0
Outcome
lowest resulte0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no water application on Bisma variety showed the lowest result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress made production of maize variety Bisma 22 % lower than that of variety Bisi-2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Bisma varietye0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
22 %e0
Comparator
Bisi-2 varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress has caused production of Bisma variety 22 % lower than Bisi-2 variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.