Paper · 2013 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Yield and yield attributes of hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671) grown for seed purpose as influenced by plant density and irrigation

M G Mula; K. B. Saxena; Abhishek Rathore; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during 2009–10 and 2010–11 cropping seasons in Vertisols at Patancheru, AP, India to evaluate the agronomic viability for large-scale seeds production of hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671) from a cytoplasmic male-sterile (CMS) line ICPA 2043. The experimental treatments include two row ratio (4 male sterile:1 male fertile and 3 male-sterile:1 male fertile), two row spacings (150 cm and 75 cm), two intra row spacing's (50 cm and 30 cm), and two irrigation frequencies (14 and 21 days intervals). Results revealed that no significant difference was noticed during both years of study on the interactive effects of row ratio + spacing, row ratio + irrigation, spacing + irrigation, and row ratio + spacing + irrigation. Individual plants at wider spacing showed significant positive effect on various agronomic traits but this did not translate into increased seed yield due to plant density. However, there was a significant difference on the effect of row ratio and spacing. Row ratio of 4:1 produced the highest seed yield (1306 kg/ha) due to more number of rows of male sterile lines than in 3:1. Aplant spacing of 75 cm x 30 cm provided the highest seed yield (3255 kg/ha) as compared to the other treatments. The study also revealed that the application of 2 to 3 irrigations during flower initiation till pod development is required to develop a good seed yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A row ratio of 4:1 gave the highest seed yield, 1306 kg/ha, compared with 3:1.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Row ratio of 4:1e1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1306 kg/hae1
Qualifier
due to more number of rows of male sterile linese1
Comparator
3:1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“Row ratio of 4:1 produced the highest seed yield (1306 kg/ha) due to more number of rows of male sterile lines than in 3:1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing of 75 cm x 30 cm gave the highest seed yield, 3255 kg/ha, compared with other treatments.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
plant spacing of 75 cm x 30 cme1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3255 kg/hae1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aplant spacing of 75 cm x 30 cm provided the highest seed yield (3255 kg/ha) as compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactive effects of row ratio, spacing and irrigation on the measured traits were not significant.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
interactive effectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant difference was noticed during both years of study on the interactive effects of row ratio + spacing, row ratio + irrigation, spacing + irrigation, and row ratio + spacing + irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–748 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual plants at wider spacing had a significant positive effect on various agronomic traits.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
various agronomic traitse1
Qualifier
Individual plants at wider spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“Individual plants at wider spacing showed significant positive effect on various agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wider-spacing effect on agronomic traits did not translate into increased seed yield, owing to plant density.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Qualifier
due to plant densitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“this did not translate into increased seed yield due to plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–921 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of row ratio and spacing on the measured traits differed significantly.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
effect of row ratio and spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a significant difference on the effect of row ratio and spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1005 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two to three irrigations from flower initiation to pod development are required for a good seed yield.

Taxon
hybrid pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
2 to 3 irrigationse1
Outcome
a good seed yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of 2 to 3 irrigations during flower initiation till pod development is required to develop a good seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1398 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.