Abstract
Studies in north-central Nebraska from 1975 through 1977: 1. Evaluated the malting barley production potential of the irrigated sandy soils of the region. 2. Measured the effect of application of N and S on yield and quality of barley grown for malting purposes. 3. Investigated the ability of N analysis of barley in the vegetative stage to predict protein content of grain at harvest. Data gathered lead to the following conclusions: 1. The potential for production of malting barley on irrigated sandy soils of north-central Nebraska is limited. 2. Yields increased with the application of fertilizer N throughout the study although response varied with site and variety. 3. Application of fertilizer S had no effect on yield throughout the study. 4. Application of N increased the protein content of all grain varieties studied by approximately 2 to 3 percent. 5. Analysis of plant material collected at the boot stage for N provided a reliable indication of the grain protein content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Malting barley production potential on irrigated sandy soils in north-central Nebraska was limited.
Verbatim
e0“The potential for production of malting barley on irrigated sandy soils of north-central Nebraska is limited”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer nitrogen increased barley yields, with response varying by site and variety.
- Taxon
- Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- fertilizer Ne0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- response varied with site and varietye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Yields increased with the application of fertilizer N throughout the study although response varied with site and variety”
t0“Malting Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer sulfur had no yield effect.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- fertilizer Se0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of fertilizer S had no effect on yield throughout the study”
t0“Malting Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application increased grain protein content by approximately 2 to 3 percent across studied varieties.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- approximately 2 to 3 percente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of N increased the protein content of all grain varieties studied by approximately 2 to 3 percent”
t0“Malting Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Boot-stage plant nitrogen analysis reliably indicated grain protein content.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Organ / stage
- boot stagee0
- Outcome
- reliable indication of the grain protein contente0
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Analysis of plant material collected at the boot stage for N provided a reliable indication of the grain protein content”
t0“Malting Barley”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.