Paper · 2015 · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Lobule shape evolution inRadula(Jungermanniopsida): one rate fits all?

Matt A. M. Renner

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The quantification of lobule shape for Radula spp. shows that there is overlap in lobule shape space occupied by subgenera, such that lobule shape does not always reflect relationships. Morphological convergence caused by lineages repeatedly traversing shared regions of morphospace appears commonplace in Radula, and means that many pairs of relatively unrelated species have similar lobule shapes. When observed over time, as in comparisons between fossil and extant species, this may give the impression of stasis if fossil species resemble modern species by chance, independent of their relatedness. This poses a challenge to relating fossils of known age to extant lineages, particularly when fossils are sterile. Significant rate variation between lineages was identified by Adams' Q-mode analysis, with the fastest subgenus evolving 23 times more quickly than the slowest. Species of subgenus Volutoradula and subgenus Metaradula are apparently over-dispersed throughout lobule morphospace according to Sidlauskas' method; morphometric branch lengths and hypervolumes in other subgenera can be explained by a stochastic process. In contrast, Bayesian analysis of macroevolutionary mixtures (BAMM) identified a single evolutionary rate as having the highest posterior probability. Consideration of the three independent accessions into auriculate lobule morphospace by Cladoradula and Radula, wherein convergent lobule shapes result from convergent lobule ontogenies and are correlated with bipinnately branched shoot systems and robust primary stems, leads to an ontogenetic hypothesis driven by structural requirements for light interception, under which auriculate lobules are a spandrel. It is speculated that lobules themselves, however, may be a key innovation facilitating radiation into microsites devoid of or depauperate in fungal endophytes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radula subgenera overlap in lobule shape space, so shape does not always reflect relationships.

Taxon
Radula spp.Radulae1
Organ / stage
lobulee0
Outcome
overlap in lobule shape space occupied by subgenerae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is overlap in lobule shape space occupied by subgenera, such that lobule shape does not always reflect relationships”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–184 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convergent lobule shapes are commonplace among relatively unrelated Radula species.

Taxon
RadulaRadulae0
Organ / stage
lobulee0
Outcome
similar lobule shapese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological convergence caused by lineages repeatedly traversing shared regions of morphospace appears commonplace in Radula, and means that many pairs of relatively unrelated species have similar lobule shapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adams Q-mode analysis found significant evolutionary rate variation, with the fastest subgenus evolving 23 times faster than the slowest.

Taxon
Radula spp.Radulae1
Outcome
rate variation between lineagese0
Direction
more quicklye0
Value
23 timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant rate variation between lineages was identified by Adams' Q-mode analysis, with the fastest subgenus evolving 23 times more quickly than the slowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volutoradula species were apparently over-dispersed through lobule morphospace.

Taxon
Radula spp.Radulae1
Material
subgenus Volutoradulae0
Outcome
over-dispersed throughout lobule morphospacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Species of subgenus Volutoradula and subgenus Metaradula are apparently over-dispersed throughout lobule morphospace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metaradula species were apparently over-dispersed through lobule morphospace.

Taxon
Radula spp.Radulae1
Material
subgenus Metaradulae0
Outcome
over-dispersed throughout lobule morphospacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Species of subgenus Volutoradula and subgenus Metaradula are apparently over-dispersed throughout lobule morphospace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A stochastic process could explain morphometric branch lengths and hypervolumes in other subgenera.

Taxon
Radula spp.Radulae1
Outcome
morphometric branch lengths and hypervolumese0
Qualifier
stochastic processe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“morphometric branch lengths and hypervolumes in other subgenera can be explained by a stochastic process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAMM assigned the highest posterior probability to a single evolutionary rate.

Taxon
Radula spp.Radulae1
Outcome
single evolutionary rate as having the highest posterior probabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bayesian analysis of macroevolutionary mixtures (BAMM) identified a single evolutionary rate as having the highest posterior probability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three independent entries into auriculate lobule morphospace occurred in Cladoradula and Radula.

Taxon
Cladoradula and RadulaRadulaCladoradulae0
Outcome
independent accessions into auriculate lobule morphospacee0
Value
threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three independent accessions into auriculate lobule morphospace by Cladoradula and Radula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1397 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convergent lobule shapes were associated with convergent ontogenies, bipinnate branching and robust primary stems.

Taxon
Cladoradula and RadulaRadulaCladoradulae1
Organ / stage
bipinnately branched shoot systems and robust primary stemse0
Outcome
convergent lobule shapese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“convergent lobule shapes result from convergent lobule ontogenies and are correlated with bipinnately branched shoot systems and robust primary stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1556 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cladoradula and Radula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1397 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auriculate lobules were hypothesized to be a spandrel of structural requirements for light interception.

Taxon
RadulaRadulae1
Outcome
auriculate lobules are a spandrele0
Qualifier
structural requirements for light interceptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ontogenetic hypothesis driven by structural requirements for light interception, under which auriculate lobules are a spandrel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula, wherein convergent lobule shapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1431 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lobules were speculated to facilitate radiation into microsites lacking or poor in fungal endophytes.

Taxon
RadulaRadulae1
Organ / stage
lobulese0
Interactor
fungal endophytesFungie0symbiont
Outcome
radiation into microsites devoid of or depauperate in fungal endophytese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radula
Radula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lobules themselves, however, may be a key innovation facilitating radiation into microsites devoid of or depauperate in fungal endophytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1857 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radula, wherein convergent lobule shapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1431 · show in text ↑