Paper · 1981 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Foliar Fertilization of Cotton

Timothy R. Peoples; C. J. Cain

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Various rates and combinations of urea (46 -0 -0), ammonium phosphate (11 -48 -0) and potassium nitrate (13 -0 -46) were applied to short staple cotton as foliar sprays in Marana and Phoenix, Arizona. The test plots were in a randomized complete block design with five replications of each treatment. Plots were four rows by 30 feet with a five foot alley between plots. The center two rows were mechanically harvested for lint yield following termination. While the application of foliar fertilizers had no significant effect on seed cotton yields in Phoenix, AZ, yields were significantly increased in Marana, AZ (Table 1). The highest yields were associated with high levels of applied fertilizer, primarily in the form of nitrogen. The lower yielding plots received little or no applied fertilizer. These data are encouraging as to the potential of foliar applied fertilizers to increase yield of cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer had no significant effect on seed cotton yield in Phoenix.

Treatment
foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Setting
Phoenix, AZe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of foliar fertilizers had no significant effect on seed cotton yields in Phoenix, AZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer significantly increased seed cotton yield in Marana.

Treatment
foliar fertilizerse1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Marana, AZe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were significantly increased in Marana, AZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–614 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of foliar fertilizers had no significant effect on seed cotton yields in Phoenix, AZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–563 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest cotton yields were associated with high fertilizer application, mainly nitrogen.

Treatment
high levels of applied fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
primarily in the form of nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were associated with high levels of applied fertilizer, primarily in the form of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed cotton yields in Phoenix, AZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–563 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-yielding cotton plots received little or no fertilizer.

Treatment
little or no applied fertilizere0
Outcome
lower yieldinge0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower yielding plots received little or no applied fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–802 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed cotton yields in Phoenix, AZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–563 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.