Claim · model-written summary
Potassium fertilization did not affect cotton flower production at either planting date.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Potassium fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- flower productione0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Potassium fertilization did not affect flower production in either planting date in any year”
t0“Cotton Yield”
Title
Planting Date and Potassium Fertility Effects on Cotton Yield and Fiber Properties
Philip J. Bauer; O. Lloyd May; James J. Camberato jpa 1998. doi:10.2134/jpa1998.0415
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Potassium deficiency reduced lint yield of cotton PD 5286.
- Intervention effect Potassium deficiency reduced lint yield of cotton PD 5358.
- Intervention effect Potassium deficiency reduced fiber length in cotton PD 5286.
- Intervention effect Potassium deficiency reduced fiber length in cotton PD 5358.
- Intervention effect Potassium deficiency did not reduce lint yield or fiber length in cotton PD 5472.
- Intervention effect Potassium deficiency reduced cotton fiber perimeter.
- Intervention effect Late planting reduced cotton yield in one of three years and two of three genotypes.
- Intervention effect Cotton planted in late May had higher yarn strength, elongation and fiber length than cotton planted in late April.
- Intervention effect Cotton planted in late May had lower micronaire and fiber maturity than cotton planted in late April.
- Association Potassium fertilization and planting date had no significant interaction for cotton lint yield, yarn strength or fiber properties.
- Recommendation Additional potassium fertility attention is not needed when cotton boll maturation is delayed.