Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium deficiency reduced cotton fiber perimeter.

A claim from Planting Date and Potassium Fertility Effects on Cotton Yield and Fiber Properties · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium deficiency reduced cotton fiber perimeter.

Treatment
K deficiencye0
Outcome
fiber perimetere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fiber perimeter was the only parameter reduced by K deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1389
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61

Title

Planting Date and Potassium Fertility Effects on Cotton Yield and Fiber Properties

Philip J. Bauer; O. Lloyd May; James J. Camberato jpa 1998. doi:10.2134/jpa1998.0415

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d4d9c154cbffbf324a1ae313adba7429de2c38114a038e9acb642c5b8e0c2239 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

potassium · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

57 papers: 44 positive, 13 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
    K deficiency reduced lint yield by 9%

    Genotypic Interactions with Potassium and Nitrogen in Cotton of Varied Maturity · 1996 · compared with 112 kg ha −1 K

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.