Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar potassium and zinc treatments did not significantly affect fiber quality traits in either season.

A claim from RESPONSE OF COTTON GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY TO APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM AND ZINC UNDER NORMAL AND LATE SOWING DATES · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium and zinc treatments did not significantly affect fiber quality traits in either season.

Material
Giza 86e0
Treatment
foliar application of potassium and zince5
Outcome
all fiber quality traitse5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Qualifier
in both seasonse5
Setting
Sakha Agric. Res. Sta., Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42
e0

“Two field experiments were carried out in Sakha Agric. Res. Sta., Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt during two growing seasons (2007 and 2008) using the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–185
e5

“The foliar application of potassium and zinc treatments did not exhibit any significant effect on all fiber quality traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–2034

Title

RESPONSE OF COTTON GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY TO APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM AND ZINC UNDER NORMAL AND LATE SOWING DATES

M. Emara Journal of Plant Production 2012. doi:10.21608/jpp.2012.84189

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-cfcd115dd788c042c6f166792f9868f446c6a1f5f08350569d2a55d61534729c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

potassium · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

57 papers: 44 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    K deficiency reduced lint yield by 9%

    Genotypic Interactions with Potassium and Nitrogen in Cotton of Varied Maturity · 1996 · compared with 112 kg ha −1 K

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.