Paper · 2025 · Journal of Sustainable Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Response of Cotton to Mineral Nitrogen-Phosphorus Fertilization and Nano-Fertilizers of Zinc and Copper

Basem Wagdy Elshazly; Abdel Azim Kattosh; Mohsen Mohamed Sharaf; et al.

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Egypt, during the 2023 and 2024 seasons to evaluate the effects of three nitrogen-phosphorus (NP) fertilizer rates—75%, 100% (recommended rate, control), and 125%—combined with foliar applications of Nano-zinc (200 ppm) and/or Nano-copper (20 ppm) three times on the productivity and quality of the cotton cultivar Super Giza 97. A strip plot design with three replicates was used. The data indicated that ncreasing NP rate, foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination and their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves, growth traits, earliness attributes (except boll shedding % which was decreased), seed cotton yield/fed and its components in both seasons and significantly decreased LWD, OP, PMI, and proline concentrations. Zn and Cu concentrations in leaves were significantly decreased under high NP rate and significantly increased with nano fertilizers. Applying 125% NP rate improved fiber length and uniformity index in both seasons, and fiber strength and micronaire reading in one season. Fiber length and uniformity index were significantly increased by spraying Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination in one season, while their combination with 125% NP rate significantly improved fiber length and strength in both seasons and uniformity index in one season. It could be recommended that the application of 125% NP rate and sprayed with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination led to an increase in the cotton productivity and quality under Sakha region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NP rate increased cotton leaf water status, nutrients, pigments, and carbohydrates.

Treatment
ncreasing NP ratee0
Outcome
TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ncreasing NP rate, foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination and their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano zinc and copper spraying increased cotton leaf water status, nutrients, pigments, and carbohydrates.

Treatment
foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combinatione0
Outcome
TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination and their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of NP rate and combined nano fertilizers increased cotton leaf water status, nutrients, pigments, and carbohydrates.

Treatment
their interactione0
Outcome
TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NP rate increased cotton growth, earliness, and seed cotton yield and components in both seasons.

Treatment
ncreasing NP ratee0
Outcome
growth traits, earliness attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ncreasing NP rate, foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination and their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves, growth traits, earliness attributes (except boll shedding % which was decreased), seed cotton yield/fed and its components in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano zinc and copper spraying increased cotton growth, earliness, and seed cotton yield components in both seasons.

Treatment
foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combinatione0
Outcome
growth traits, earliness attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spraying with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination and their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves, growth traits, earliness attributes (except boll shedding % which was decreased), seed cotton yield/fed and its components in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NP and nano fertilizer interaction increased cotton growth and earliness in both seasons.

Treatment
their interactione0
Outcome
growth traits, earliness attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their interaction significantly increased TWC, RWC, N, P, photosynthesis pigments and total carbohydrate concentrations in cotton leaves, growth traits, earliness attributes (except boll shedding % which was decreased), seed cotton yield/fed and its components in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer factors decreased cotton boll shedding in both seasons.

Treatment
Nano-Fertilizers of Zinc and Coppert0
Outcome
boll shedding %e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“earliness attributes (except boll shedding % which was decreased), seed cotton yield/fed and its components in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cotton to Mineral Nitrogen-Phosphorus Fertilization and Nano-Fertilizers of Zinc and Copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer factors significantly decreased cotton LWD, OP, PMI, and proline concentrations.

Treatment
Nano-Fertilizers of Zinc and Coppert0
Outcome
LWD, OP, PMI, and proline concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly decreased LWD, OP, PMI, and proline concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Cotton to Mineral Nitrogen-Phosphorus Fertilization and Nano-Fertilizers of Zinc and Copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NP rate decreased cotton leaf zinc and copper concentrations.

Treatment
high NP ratee0
Outcome
Zn and Cu concentrations in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn and Cu concentrations in leaves were significantly decreased under high NP rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano fertilizers increased cotton leaf zinc and copper concentrations.

Treatment
nano fertilizerse0
Outcome
Zn and Cu concentrations in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn and Cu concentrations in leaves were significantly decreased under high NP rate and significantly increased with nano fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% NP rate improved fiber length and uniformity in both seasons.

Treatment
125% NP ratee0
Outcome
fiber length and uniformity indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 125% NP rate improved fiber length and uniformity index in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% NP rate improved fiber strength and micronaire in one season.

Treatment
125% NP ratee0
Outcome
fiber strength and micronaire readinge0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in one seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 125% NP rate improved fiber length and uniformity index in both seasons, and fiber strength and micronaire reading in one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano zinc and copper spraying increased fiber length and uniformity in one season.

Treatment
spraying Nano zinc and Nano copper in combinatione0
Outcome
Fiber length and uniformity indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in one seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fiber length and uniformity index were significantly increased by spraying Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination in one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano fertilizers with 125% NP improved fiber length and strength in both seasons.

Treatment
their combination with 125% NP ratee0
Outcome
fiber length and strengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their combination with 125% NP rate significantly improved fiber length and strength in both seasons and uniformity index in one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano fertilizers with 125% NP improved fiber uniformity in one season.

Treatment
their combination with 125% NP ratee0
Outcome
uniformity indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in one seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their combination with 125% NP rate significantly improved fiber length and strength in both seasons and uniformity index in one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 125% NP with combined nano zinc and copper for cotton productivity and quality at Sakha.

Treatment
125% NP rate and sprayed with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combinatione0
Outcome
cotton productivity and qualitye0
Setting
Sakha regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It could be recommended that the application of 125% NP rate and sprayed with Nano zinc and Nano copper in combination led to an increase in the cotton productivity and quality under Sakha region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1657 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

copper atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.