Paper · 2004 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of Potassium Rates and Sources on Fiber Quality Parameters in Four Cultivars of Cotton Grown in Aridisols

H. Pervez; M. Ashraf; M. I. Makhdum

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was conducted using four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12 supplied with four rates of potassium fertilizer (0, 62.5, 125.0, 250.0 kg K ha−1) and two sources of potassium fertilizer (K2SO4, KCl) to determine the effect of potassium fertilizer on fiber quality. Result showed that fiber quality parameters differed significantly in response to various potassium fertilizer levels and sources in different cultivars. Fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strength, and fiber maturity ratio increased due to addition of potassium fertilizer. Sulphate of potash had an edge over muriate of potash in improving fiber quality parameters. Each of fiber quality parameters was positively correlated to potassium concentration in fiber tissues at maturity, potassium concentration in leaf tissues at bloom stage and ammonium acetate extracted- potassium in the soil. These investigations indicate that adequate potassium supply to developing fruit was an important determinant of lint parameters to produce quality cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber length, fiber fineness and fiber strength increased with potassium fertilizer addition in four cotton cultivars in a field experiment.

Material
CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12e1
Treatment
addition of potassium fertilizere2
Outcome
Fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strengthe2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted using four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–137 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strength, and fiber maturity ratio increased due to addition of potassium fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber maturity ratio increased with potassium fertilizer addition in four cotton cultivars in a field experiment.

Material
CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12e1
Treatment
addition of potassium fertilizere2
Outcome
fiber maturity ratioe2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted using four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–137 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strength, and fiber maturity ratio increased due to addition of potassium fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of potash improved fiber quality parameters more than muriate of potash in cotton.

Material
CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12e1
Treatment
Sulphate of potashe3
Outcome
fiber quality parameterse3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Comparator
muriate of potashe3
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted using four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sulphate of potash had an edge over muriate of potash in improving fiber quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–707 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber quality parameters were positively correlated with potassium concentration in fiber tissues at maturity, potassium in leaf tissues at bloom stage and soil ammonium acetate extracted potassium.

Organ / stage
fiber tissues at maturitye4
Compound
potassiume4
Outcome
fiber quality parameterse4
Direction
positively correlatede4
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted using four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–137 · show in text ↑
e4

“Each of fiber quality parameters was positively correlated to potassium concentration in fiber tissues at maturity, potassium concentration in leaf tissues at bloom stage and ammonium acetate extracted- potassium in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber quality parameters differed significantly among potassium fertilizer levels and sources across cotton cultivars.

Treatment
various potassium fertilizer levels and sourcese5
Outcome
fiber quality parameterse5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted using four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars: CIM-448, CIM-1100, NIAB-Karishma, and S-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–137 · show in text ↑
e5

“fiber quality parameters differed significantly in response to various potassium fertilizer levels and sources in different cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–492 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

57 papers: 44 positive, 13 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    K deficiency reduced lint yield by 9%

    Genotypic Interactions with Potassium and Nitrogen in Cotton of Varied Maturity · 1996 · compared with 112 kg ha −1 K

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.