Paper · 2018 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of deficit irrigation and potassium fertilization on quantity and quality of Giza 95 cotton plants

S. Abd El-Gayed; S. Bashandy

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

TWO FIELD experiments were conducted at the Farm of Sids Agricultural Research Station, ARC, Egypt, during 2016 and 2017 seasons to study the response of cotton to potassium fertilization (12, 24, 36 and 48kg K2O) as soil application as well as 5kg K2O/fad as foliar spraying three times at squaring, beginning of flowering and top of flowering) under different irrigation intervals at recommended irrigation interval (every 12 days), every 15 days, every 18 days and every 21 days). The results show that increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 days exhibited the highest values of plant height, number of fruiting branches/ plant, number of open polls/plant, seed cotton yield, earliness % and seed index as well as leaf content of N, K, chlorophyll A and B and carotenoids. On the other hand, lint percentage and fiber properties did not respond to either potassium or irrigation treatments, while P content increased as increasing water irrigation. Increasing both potassium levels and the irrigation intervals improved water use efficiency and water utilization efficiency. The results of the interaction between potassium and irrigation treatments reveal that irrigation cotton plants every 15 days when fertilized with 48kg K2O/fad as soil application produced highest growth, yield and its components and chemical content of cotton leaf equal to these irrigated every 12 days and supplied water 36 or 48kg K2O/fad.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil potassium and a 12-day irrigation interval gave the highest cotton plant height, fruiting branch number and open boll number.

Treatment
increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 dayse0
Outcome
highest values of plant height, number of fruiting branches/ plant, number of open polls/plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 days exhibited the highest values of plant height, number of fruiting branches/ plant, number of open polls/plant, seed cotton yield, earliness % and seed index as well as leaf content of N, K, chlorophyll A and B and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil potassium and a 12-day irrigation interval gave the highest seed cotton yield, earliness and seed index.

Treatment
increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 dayse0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, earliness % and seed indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 days exhibited the highest values of plant height, number of fruiting branches/ plant, number of open polls/plant, seed cotton yield, earliness % and seed index as well as leaf content of N, K, chlorophyll A and B and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil potassium and a 12-day irrigation interval gave the highest leaf N, K, chlorophyll A and B, and carotenoids.

Treatment
increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 dayse0
Outcome
leaf content of N, K, chlorophyll A and B and carotenoidse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that increasing potassium fertilization up to 36kg or 48kg K2O/fad as soil application as well as decreasing irrigation interval to 12 days exhibited the highest values of plant height, number of fruiting branches/ plant, number of open polls/plant, seed cotton yield, earliness % and seed index as well as leaf content of N, K, chlorophyll A and B and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint percentage did not respond to potassium or irrigation treatments.

Treatment
potassium or irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
lint percentagee0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint percentage and fiber properties did not respond to either potassium or irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber properties did not respond to potassium or irrigation treatments.

Treatment
potassium or irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber propertiese0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint percentage and fiber properties did not respond to either potassium or irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P content increased with more irrigation.

Treatment
increasing water irrigatione0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P content increased as increasing water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium levels and irrigation intervals improved water use efficiency.

Treatment
Increasing both potassium levels and the irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing both potassium levels and the irrigation intervals improved water use efficiency and water utilization efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium levels and irrigation intervals improved water utilization efficiency.

Treatment
Increasing both potassium levels and the irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
water utilization efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing both potassium levels and the irrigation intervals improved water use efficiency and water utilization efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton irrigated every 15 days with 48kg K2O/fad achieved the highest growth, yield, yield components and leaf chemistry, equal to plants irrigated every 12 days with 36 or 48kg K2O/fad.

Treatment
every 15 days when fertilized with 48kg K2O/fad as soil applicatione0
Outcome
growth, yield and its componentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigated every 12 days and supplied water 36 or 48kg K2O/fade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation cotton plants every 15 days when fertilized with 48kg K2O/fad as soil application produced highest growth, yield and its components and chemical content of cotton leaf equal to these irrigated every 12 days and supplied water 36 or 48kg K2O/fad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Giza 95 cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

57 papers: 44 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    K deficiency reduced lint yield by 9%

    Genotypic Interactions with Potassium and Nitrogen in Cotton of Varied Maturity · 1996 · compared with 112 kg ha −1 K

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

potassium · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

potassium · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 26 positive, 13 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.