Paper · 1969 · Acta Botanica Neerlandica

CYTOTAXONOMIC STUDIES IN THE GENUS SYMPHYTUM. II

Th. W. J. Gadella; E. Kliphuis

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crossing experiments were carried out between the three cytotypes (2n = 24, 2n = 40 and 2n = 48) of Symphytum officinale and that of Symphytum asperum (2n = 32). The results indicate that morphologically closely related types are sometimes crossable, whereas in other cases no hybrids could be produced. On the other hand morphologically very distinct types could be crossed with great ease. The significance of these studies for the elucidation of taxonomic problems is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some morphologically close Symphytum types were crossable.

Taxon
Symphytum officinaleSymphytum officinalee0
Outcome
morphologically closely related types are sometimes crossablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Symphytum officinale
Symphytum officinale · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień ( Nova ) · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between the three cytotypes (2n = 24, 2n = 40 and 2n = 48) of Symphytum officinale and that of Symphytum asperum (2n = 32). The results indicate that morphologically closely related types are sometimes crossable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other morphologically close Symphytum types did not yield hybrids.

Taxon
Symphytum officinaleSymphytum officinalee0
Outcome
no hybrids could be producede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Symphytum officinale
Symphytum officinale · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień ( Nova ) · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between the three cytotypes (2n = 24, 2n = 40 and 2n = 48) of Symphytum officinale and that of Symphytum asperum (2n = 32). The results indicate that morphologically closely related types are sometimes crossable, whereas in other cases no hybrids could be produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphologically distinct Symphytum types crossed easily.

Taxon
Symphytum asperumSymphytum asperume0
Outcome
morphologically very distinct types could be crossed with great easee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Symphytum asperum
Symphytum asperum · TaxonХомелка · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symphytum officinale and that of Symphytum asperum (2n = 32). The results indicate that morphologically closely related types are sometimes crossable, whereas in other cases no hybrids could be produced. On the other hand morphologically very distinct types could be crossed with great ease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–390 · show in text ↑