Paper · 2019 · BIOTROPIA

EFFECTS OF PISOLITHUS TINCTORIUS AND LACCARIA FRATERNA ON THE GROWTH AND MYCORRfflZAL DEVELOPMENT OF PINUSPATULA SEEDLINGS*)

M. SUDHAKARA REDDY; K. NATARAJAN

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Vegetative inoculum of Pisolithus tinctorius and Laccariafraterna were inoculated to Pinuspatula seedlings grown in both steam sterilized and unsterilized shola soil. After 4 months of seedling growth, 10 seedlings from each treatment were harvested and various growth parameters were studied. Inoculation of these two fungi resulted in the production of ectomycorrhizas and increase in growth of P. patula seedlings when compared to uninoculated seedlings. Laccariafraterna inoculated seedlings showed more number of mycorrhizas than P. tinctorius inoculated seedlings at the end of one year. Both these fungi poorly colonized the root system in both soil treatments. There was no significant difference between these two fungi in improving the seedling growth in the nursery. Key words: Pisolithus tinctorius/Laccaria fraterna/Pinus patula/Inoculum/Seedlings/Growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Pisolithus tinctorius and Laccaria fraterna increased growth of P. patula seedlings compared with uninoculated seedlings.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae2
Treatment
Inoculatione2
Interactor
Pisolithus tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse1symbiont
Second interactor
Laccariafraternae1symbiont
Outcome
growth of P. patula seedlingse2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
uninoculated seedlingse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pisolithus tinctorius
Pisolithus tinctorius · InteractorPaul venter · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vegetative inoculum of Pisolithus tinctorius and Laccariafraterna were inoculated to Pinuspatula seedlings grown in both steam sterilized and unsterilized shola soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation of these two fungi resulted in the production of ectomycorrhizas and increase in growth of P. patula seedlings when compared to uninoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with the two fungi produced ectomycorrhizas on P. patula seedlings.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae2
Treatment
Inoculatione2
Outcome
production of ectomycorrhizase2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Inoculation of these two fungi resulted in the production of ectomycorrhizas and increase in growth of P. patula seedlings when compared to uninoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laccaria fraterna inoculated seedlings had more mycorrhizas than Pisolithus tinctorius inoculated seedlings after one year.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae2
Treatment
Laccariafraterna inoculatede3
Interactor
Laccariafraternae3symbiont
Second interactor
P. tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse3symbiont
Outcome
number of mycorrhizase3
Direction
moree3
Comparator
P. tinctorius inoculated seedlingse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pisolithus tinctorius
Pisolithus tinctorius · Second interactorPaul venter · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Inoculation of these two fungi resulted in the production of ectomycorrhizas and increase in growth of P. patula seedlings when compared to uninoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
e3

“Laccariafraterna inoculated seedlings showed more number of mycorrhizas than P. tinctorius inoculated seedlings at the end of one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungi poorly colonized the root system of P. patula seedlings in both soil treatments.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae2
Outcome
colonized the root systeme4
Qualifier
poorlye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Inoculation of these two fungi resulted in the production of ectomycorrhizas and increase in growth of P. patula seedlings when compared to uninoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both these fungi poorly colonized the root system in both soil treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–667 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two fungi did not differ in improving seedling growth in the nursery.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae2
Treatment
these two fungie5
Outcome
seedling growthe5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Setting
in the nurserye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Inoculation of these two fungi resulted in the production of ectomycorrhizas and increase in growth of P. patula seedlings when compared to uninoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant difference between these two fungi in improving the seedling growth in the nursery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–776 · show in text ↑