Abstract
Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5) continued upto 7 days with majority being achieved by 4th day. H. zeae penetrated root tissues at both meristematic and zone of elongation as compared to M. incognita which predominantly invaded at meristematic zone. In case of simultaneous inoculations M. incognita did not seem to interfere with the penetration of H. zeae while penetration of M. incognita was adversely affected by presence of H- zeae. On the other hand, T. vulgaris tended to enhance the penetration of M. incognita. Prior establishment of any of the nematode species by three days either singly or in combination significantly reduced invasiveness of the other species. Larval penetration of both cyst and root-knot nematodes was more whenever they were inoculated earlier.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Heterodera zeae larvae penetrated maize root tissue at both the meristematic zone and the zone of elongation.
- Organ / stage
- meristematic and zone of elongatione1
- Interactor
- H. zeaeHeterodera zeaee1pathogen
- Outcome
- penetrated root tissuese1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e1“H. zeae penetrated root tissues at both meristematic and zone of elongation”
Claim · model-written summary
Meloidogyne incognita larvae predominantly invaded the meristematic zone of maize roots.
- Organ / stage
- meristematic zonee1
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- predominantly invadede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e1“M. incognita which predominantly invaded at meristematic zone”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous inoculation with M. incognita did not seem to interfere with H. zeae penetration of maize roots.
- Treatment
- simultaneous inoculationse2
- Interactor
- H. zeaeHeterodera zeaee2pathogen
- Second interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
- Outcome
- penetration of H. zeaee2
- Direction
- did not seem to interferee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e2“In case of simultaneous inoculations M. incognita did not seem to interfere with the penetration of H. zeae”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior presence of H. zeae adversely affected M. incognita penetration of maize roots.
- Treatment
- presence of H- zeaee2
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
- Second interactor
- H- zeaee2pathogen
- Outcome
- penetration of M. incognitae2
- Direction
- adversely affectede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e2“while penetration of M. incognita was adversely affected by presence of H- zeae”
Claim · model-written summary
Tylenchorhynchus vulgaris tended to enhance M. incognita penetration of maize roots.
- Treatment
- T. vulgarise3
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pathogen
- Second interactor
- T. vulgarise3pest
- Outcome
- penetration of M. incognitae3
- Direction
- tended to enhancee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e3“On the other hand, T. vulgaris tended to enhance the penetration of M. incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Establishing any nematode species three days earlier significantly reduced invasiveness of the other species on maize roots.
- Treatment
- Prior establishment of any of the nematode species by three days either singly or in combinatione4
- Outcome
- invasiveness of the other speciese4
- Direction
- significantly reducede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e4“Prior establishment of any of the nematode species by three days either singly or in combination significantly reduced invasiveness of the other species”
Claim · model-written summary
Larval penetration of nematodes was higher when they were inoculated earlier.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larval penetration of Heterodera zeae and Meloidogyne incognita into maize roots (Cv. Ganga 5)”
e5“Larval penetration of both cyst and root-knot nematodes was more whenever they were inoculated earlier”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Heterodera zeae · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.