Paper · 1971 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Control of Cercospora leafspot of sugar beet …under sprinkler irrigation

A Paulus; O Harvey; J. M. Nelson; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Benomyl was significantly better than all other materials tested for control of Cercospora leafspot of sugar beet when applied by ground or aerial application, and was equally effective on a 10-, 18-, or 21-day spray schedule. This is a progress report of research. Benomyl is not registered for use in sugar beets at this time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl controlled Cercospora leafspot of sugar beet significantly better than all other tested materials with ground or aerial application.

Treatment
Benomyle0
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
control of Cercospora leafspote0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
ground or aerial applicatione0
Comparator
all other materials testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benomyl was significantly better than all other materials tested for control of Cercospora leafspot of sugar beet when applied by ground or aerial application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl was equally effective on 10-, 18-, and 21-day spray schedules.

Treatment
10-, 18-, or 21-day spray schedulee0
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporat0pathogen
Outcome
equally effectivee0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
10-, 18-, or 21-day spray schedulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was equally effective on a 10-, 18-, or 21-day spray schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Cercospora leafspot of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Control of Cercospora leafspot of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑

benomyl · Cercospora · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · Cercospora · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.