Abstract
In this study six mineral elements; Copper sulfate (Cu SO₄), Potassium sulfate (K2 SO₄), Micron Sulfure (S), Boric acid (H3 BO3), Copper sulfate + Micron Sulfure (Cu SO₄ + S) and Potassium sulfate + Boric acid (K2 SO₄ + H3 BO3) as well as fungicide; Montoro 30% were used as foliar spraying. These elements were evaluated against Cercospora, leaf spot disease on sugar beet under field conditions during two season; 2017/18 and 2018/19. All foliar applications were significantly reduced the disease severity % compared to untreated treatment during the two seasons. Potassium and combined application of Potassium and Boron treatments recorded the high value of sugar beet leaf dry weight over the control. Sulfure application led to an increase the fresh weight of sugar beet root, while Boron application increased the total soluble solid (TSS), sucrose % and purity %. Results obtained showed significant increasing (%) in catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenolosxidase (PPO) activities in the case of mineral application and Montoro 30% fungicide compare with untreated treatment. However, the present study showed that foliar application of mineral elements tested in increased yield components of sugar beet, and thus is recommended to increase root yield and quality as well as can reduce disease severity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar applications reduced Cercospora leaf spot disease severity versus untreated treatment in both seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- foliar applicationse0
- Interactor
- Cercospora
Cercosporae0pathogen - Outcome
- Cercospora, leaf spot diseasee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- untreated treatmente0
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These elements were evaluated against Cercospora, leaf spot disease on sugar beet under field conditions during two season; 2017/18 and 2018/19. All foliar applications were significantly reduced the disease severity % compared to untreated treatment during the two seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium application raised sugar beet leaf dry weight over the control.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Potassiume0
- Outcome
- leaf dry weighte0
- Direction
- high valuee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Potassium and combined application of Potassium and Boron treatments recorded the high value of sugar beet leaf dry weight over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined potassium and boron application raised sugar beet leaf dry weight over the control.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- combined application of Potassium and Borone0
- Outcome
- leaf dry weighte0
- Direction
- high valuee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Potassium and combined application of Potassium and Boron treatments recorded the high value of sugar beet leaf dry weight over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur application increased sugar beet root fresh weight.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Sulfure applicatione0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of sugar beet roote0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sulfure application led to an increase the fresh weight of sugar beet root”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron application increased total soluble solids, sucrose percentage and purity percentage.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Boron applicatione0
- Outcome
- total soluble solid (TSS), sucrose % and purity %e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Boron application increased the total soluble solid (TSS), sucrose % and purity %.”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral applications increased catalase, peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activity versus untreated treatment.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- mineral applicatione0
- Outcome
- catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenolosxidase (PPO) activitiese0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- untreated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results obtained showed significant increasing (%) in catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenolosxidase (PPO) activities in the case of mineral application and Montoro 30% fungicide compare with untreated treatment.”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Montoro 30% fungicide increased catalase, peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activity versus untreated treatment.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Montoro 30% fungicidee0
- Outcome
- catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenolosxidase (PPO) activitiese0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- untreated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results obtained showed significant increasing (%) in catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenolosxidase (PPO) activities in the case of mineral application and Montoro 30% fungicide compare with untreated treatment.”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar mineral applications increased sugar beet yield components.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application of mineral elementse0
- Outcome
- yield componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of mineral elements tested in increased yield components of sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend foliar mineral application to increase root yield and quality and reduce disease severity.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- increase root yield and quality as well as can reduce disease severitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“thus is recommended to increase root yield and quality as well as can reduce disease severity.”
t0“sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →boron atom · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →application · Cercospora · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →potassium · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.