Paper · 1974 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Harvesting sugar-beet seed

P. C. Longden

15
claims
36
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Comparisons of the effects of harvesting sugar-beet seed by the traditional method of tripodding with barn drying, swathing followed by threshing with a pick-up combine or desiccation with diquat followed by direct combine harvesting showed that there were no consistent or large effects on seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution. Thus the best method will be the one which is easiest and/or cheapest, which at present is swathing followed by pick-up combine threshing. Sprays of NAA or 2,4,5-T at 10 or 100 mg a.i./l water before or after flowering had no effect on seed yield or germination and efforts to restrict the loss by shedding of large viable seed failed. Neither chemical decreased germination percentage by setting parthenocarpic seed. Attempts were made to dwarf the 2 m high seed crop to make it suitable for direct combine harvesting. Daminozide sprayed at 1000, 5000 or 10000 mg a.i./l water before or after the winter did not affect plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution. Chlormequat chloride applied similarly dwarfed plants by up to 18% but this was not enough to give a crop less than 1 m high suitable for direct combine harvesting. It did not affect seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution. Ethephon sprayed at 10, 100 or 1000 mg a.i./l water when plants were bolting had no detected effects. Chlorflurecolmethyl was sprayed at 10 or 100 before bolting or 1, 10 or 100 mg a.i./l water afterwards. Plants sprayed with the 100 mg/1 solution were dwarfed to less than 1 m high but the treatment was unsuccessful because it greatly reduced seed yield and germination; monogermity was not affected but a much greater proportion of seed fell into the small size grades.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three harvesting methods had no consistent or large effects on seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.

Treatment
swathing followed by threshing with a pick-up combinee0
Outcome
seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distributione0
Direction
no consistent or large effectse0
Comparator
traditional method of tripodding with barn dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvesting sugar-beet seed by the traditional method of tripodding with barn drying, swathing followed by threshing with a pick-up combine or desiccation with diquat followed by direct combine harvesting showed that there were no consistent or large effects on seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–356 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Swathing followed by pick-up combine threshing was recommended as the easiest or cheapest current method.

Outcome
swathing followed by pick-up combine threshinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best method will be the one which is easiest and/or cheapest, which at present is swathing followed by pick-up combine threshing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA sprays at 10 or 100 mg a.i./l water before or after flowering had no effect on seed yield or germination.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
seed yield or germinatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprays of NAA or 2,4,5-T at 10 or 100 mg a.i./l water before or after flowering had no effect on seed yield or germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4,5-T sprays at 10 or 100 mg a.i./l water before or after flowering had no effect on seed yield or germination.

Treatment
2,4,5-Te0
Outcome
seed yield or germinatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprays of NAA or 2,4,5-T at 10 or 100 mg a.i./l water before or after flowering had no effect on seed yield or germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efforts to restrict shedding loss of large viable seed failed.

Treatment
efforts to restrict the loss by sheddinge0
Outcome
loss by shedding of large viable seede0
Direction
failede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efforts to restrict the loss by shedding of large viable seed failed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither NAA nor 2,4,5-T decreased germination percentage by setting parthenocarpic seed.

Treatment
NAAe1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
Neither chemical decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither chemical decreased germination percentage by setting parthenocarpic seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sprays of NAA or 2,4,5-T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daminozide did not affect plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.

Treatment
Daminozide sprayed at 1000, 5000 or 10000 mg a.i./l watere0
Outcome
plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distributione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daminozide sprayed at 1000, 5000 or 10000 mg a.i./l water before or after the winter did not affect plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat chloride dwarfed plants by up to 18%.

Treatment
Chlormequat chloridee0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
dwarfede0
Value
up to 18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlormequat chloride applied similarly dwarfed plants by up to 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat chloride did not make the crop shorter than 1 m for direct combine harvesting.

Treatment
Chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
crop less than 1 m high suitable for direct combine harvestinge0
Direction
not enoughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this was not enough to give a crop less than 1 m high suitable for direct combine harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlormequat chloride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat chloride did not affect seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.

Treatment
Chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distributione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It did not affect seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlormequat chloride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at the tested rates when plants bolted had no detected effects.

Treatment
Ethephon sprayed at 10, 100 or 1000 mg a.i./l watere0
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
no detected effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon sprayed at 10, 100 or 1000 mg a.i./l water when plants were bolting had no detected effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorflurecolmethyl at the 100 mg/1 solution dwarfed plants to less than 1 m.

Treatment
Chlorflurecolmethyle1
Outcome
Plantse0
Direction
dwarfede0
Value
less than 1 me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with the 100 mg/1 solution were dwarfed to less than 1 m high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1575 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorflurecolmethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 mg/1 chlorflurecolmethyl treatment greatly reduced seed yield and germination.

Treatment
Chlorflurecolmethyle1
Outcome
seed yield and germinatione0
Direction
greatly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment was unsuccessful because it greatly reduced seed yield and germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorflurecolmethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorflurecolmethyl did not affect monogermity.

Treatment
Chlorflurecolmethyle1
Outcome
monogermitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monogermity was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1694 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorflurecolmethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorflurecolmethyl increased the proportion of seed in small size grades.

Treatment
Chlorflurecolmethyle1
Outcome
proportion of seed fell into the small size gradese0
Direction
much greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a much greater proportion of seed fell into the small size grades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1764 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorflurecolmethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–21 · show in text ↑

Daminozide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

chlormequat chloride · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

chloride · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.