Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying sugar beet root piles with Mepiquat chloride at 1.0 cm/L gave the highest fresh weight, length and diameter.

A claim from Study the Losses in Sugar Beet Roots After Harvesting and Reducing it by using Different Storage Methods, Covering and Spraying Treatments during Storage Periods · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying sugar beet root piles with Mepiquat chloride at 1.0 cm/L gave the highest fresh weight, length and diameter.

Treatment
spraying piles of sugar beet roots with Mepiquat chloride at 1.0 cm/Le0
Outcome
root fresh weight/plant, root length and diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter and lowest root weight loss percentages and infestation percentages of sugar beet roots were recorded when spraying piles of sugar beet roots with Mepiquat chloride at 1.0 cm/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1228

Title

Study the Losses in Sugar Beet Roots After Harvesting and Reducing it by using Different Storage Methods, Covering and Spraying Treatments during Storage Periods

Saleh Seadh; M. Abdel-Moneam; M. Ibrahim; et al. Journal of Plant Production 2021. doi:10.21608/jpp.2021.178931

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-654dd51980181663ae34d141328183a5f855e6b1bd8e91f7791304c81208f658 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

chloride · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.