Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION DATES OF YEAST (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) ON SUGAR BEET PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY

M. Abdou

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This investigation was carried out at El-Manyal Village, Talkha District, Dakahlia Governorate, during 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 growing seasons to evaluate the role of three times of foliar and soil applications of yeast at 60, 75 and 90 days after sowing (DAS), compared to the control on productivity and quality of sugar beet "cv. Kawemira". The main results could be summarized as follows: 1- Spraying plants with yeast significantly increased the averages of all studied characters in both seasons compared with the control treatment (without yeast spraying), except root diameter and root juice apparent purity percentage. 2- Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DAS resulted in gradual significant decreases in root fresh weight/plant, root length as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons. On the other side, the same treatment resulted in gradual significant increases in total soluble solids and sucrose percentages in both seasons. 3- Soil applications of yeast significantly increased the averages of root fresh weight/plant, root dimensions (length and diameter) as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons compared with the control (without yeast soil application) as well as total soluble solids percentage and root sucrose contents in the second season. On the other hand, the same treatment significantly decreased root juice apparent purity percentage in the second season. 4- Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DAS significantly decreased root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons and the percentages of root sucrose and root juice apparent purity in the second season. However, the same treatment significantly increased total soluble solids in the second season. 5- The interaction between times of foliar and soil applications of yeast had significantl effect on root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons. Generally, it could be concluded that adding yeast as a foliar and a soil applications for sugar beet plants at the age of 60 days is recommended to maximize its productivity and quality under the environmental conditions of Dakahlia Governorate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar yeast spraying increased the averages of all studied characters compared with no spraying, except root diameter and root juice apparent purity.

Treatment
Spraying plants with yeaste1
Outcome
all studied characterse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
except root diameter and root juice apparent purity percentagee1
Comparator
control treatment (without yeast spraying)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying plants with yeast significantly increased the averages of all studied characters in both seasons compared with the control treatment (without yeast spraying), except root diameter and root juice apparent purity percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying foliar yeast spraying from 60 to 70 and 90 days after sowing decreased root fresh weight per plant and root length.

Treatment
Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DASe2
Outcome
root fresh weight/plant, root lengthe2
Direction
decreasese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DAS resulted in gradual significant decreases in root fresh weight/plant, root length as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons. On the other side, the same treatment resulted in gradual significant increases in total soluble solids and sucrose percentages in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying foliar yeast spraying from 60 to 70 and 90 days after sowing decreased root and sugar yields.

Treatment
Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DASe2
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fad.e2
Direction
decreasese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DAS resulted in gradual significant decreases in root fresh weight/plant, root length as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons. On the other side, the same treatment resulted in gradual significant increases in total soluble solids and sucrose percentages in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying foliar yeast spraying increased total soluble solids and sucrose percentages.

Treatment
Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DASe2
Outcome
total soluble solids and sucrose percentagese2
Direction
increasese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“Delaying spraying beet plants with yeast from 60 to 70 and 90 DAS resulted in gradual significant decreases in root fresh weight/plant, root length as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons. On the other side, the same treatment resulted in gradual significant increases in total soluble solids and sucrose percentages in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil yeast application increased root fresh weight per plant, root dimensions and root and sugar yields.

Treatment
Soil applications of yeaste3
Outcome
root fresh weight/plant, root dimensions (length and diameter) as well as root and sugar yields/fad.e3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
control (without yeast soil application)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soil applications of yeast significantly increased the averages of root fresh weight/plant, root dimensions (length and diameter) as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons compared with the control (without yeast soil application) as well as total soluble solids percentage and root sucrose contents in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil yeast application increased total soluble solids percentage and root sucrose content in the second season.

Treatment
Soil applications of yeaste3
Outcome
total soluble solids percentage and root sucrose contentse3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
in the second seasone3
Comparator
control (without yeast soil application)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soil applications of yeast significantly increased the averages of root fresh weight/plant, root dimensions (length and diameter) as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons compared with the control (without yeast soil application) as well as total soluble solids percentage and root sucrose contents in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil yeast application decreased root juice apparent purity in the second season.

Treatment
Soil applications of yeaste3
Outcome
root juice apparent purity percentagee4
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
in the second seasone4
Comparator
control (without yeast soil application)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soil applications of yeast significantly increased the averages of root fresh weight/plant, root dimensions (length and diameter) as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons compared with the control (without yeast soil application) as well as total soluble solids percentage and root sucrose contents in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1316 · show in text ↑
e4

“On the other hand, the same treatment significantly decreased root juice apparent purity percentage in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying soil yeast application from 60 to 90 days after sowing decreased root fresh weight per plant, root length and root diameter.

Treatment
Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DASe5
Outcome
root fresh weight/plant, root length and diametere5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DAS significantly decreased root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons and the percentages of root sucrose and root juice apparent purity in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying soil yeast application from 60 to 90 days after sowing decreased root and sugar yields.

Treatment
Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DASe5
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fad.e5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DAS significantly decreased root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons and the percentages of root sucrose and root juice apparent purity in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying soil yeast application decreased root sucrose and root juice apparent purity percentages in the second season.

Treatment
Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DASe5
Outcome
percentages of root sucrose and root juice apparent puritye5
Direction
decreasede5
Qualifier
in the second seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DAS significantly decreased root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons and the percentages of root sucrose and root juice apparent purity in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying soil yeast application increased total soluble solids in the second season.

Treatment
Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DASe5
Outcome
total soluble solidse6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
in the second seasone6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Delaying soil applications of yeast from 60 to 90 DAS significantly decreased root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter as well as root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons and the percentages of root sucrose and root juice apparent purity in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1713 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, the same treatment significantly increased total soluble solids in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1808 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between times of foliar and soil yeast applications had a significant effect on root and sugar yields.

Treatment
times of foliar and soil applications of yeaste7
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fad.e7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“The interaction between times of foliar and soil applications of yeast had significantl effect on root and sugar yields/fad., in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1954 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adding yeast as foliar and soil applications at 60 days of age is recommended to maximize sugar beet productivity and quality.

Outcome
productivity and qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“adding yeast as a foliar and a soil applications for sugar beet plants at the age of 60 days is recommended to maximize its productivity and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2142 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.