Paper · 2020

Impact of nanosilicon and tebuconazole foliar application on some physiological traits, growth and white sugar yield of sugar beet under drought stress

Sh. Namjoyan; Abazar Rajabi; Ali Sorooshzadeh; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There is ample evidence to illustrate the role of triazoles and silicon in mitigating the effects of abiotic stresses. However, the potential of nano-silicon and tebuconazole and their possible interactions in ameliorating the effects of drought stress and related mechanisms in sugar beet have not been investigated so far. Therefore, a split-plot factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with four replications was carried out at Motahari Research Station of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Karaj, Iran over two seasons, 2016 and 2017. Three irrigation treatments including 100, 75, and 50% of plant evapotranspiration (normal, mild stress, and severe stress, respectively) were assigned to the main plots. Subplots were composed of a factorial combination of three nano-silicon doses of 0, 1 and 2 mM and two tebuconazole doses of 0 and 25 mg l-1. The results showed that under severe drought stress, the effect of nano-silicon on the studied traits was dose-dependent, so that the application of nano-silicon with 1mM concentration improved growth parameters as well as physiological traits and increased white sugar yield and the maximum dry matter by 20 % and 17%, respectively compared with severe drought stress treatment. Under severe drought stress condition (irrigation at 50% of plant evapotranspiration), the highest leaf area index, chlorophyll and relative water content were observed in 1 mM nano-silicon treatment. Under severe drought stress, foliar application of 2 mM nano silicon had an adverse effect on sugar yield. The combined application of nano-silicon and tebuconazole improved dry matter production and sugar yield by maintaining plant greenness and preventing leaf aging which may indicate an interaction between these two compounds. These results indicate that nano-silicon and tebuconazole can be used as a suitable tool to mitigate the effects of drought stress on sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, 1 mM nano-silicon increased white sugar yield by 20% relative to severe drought treatment.

Treatment
nano-silicon with 1mM concentratione0
Outcome
white sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 %e0
Comparator
severe drought stress treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under severe drought stress, the effect of nano-silicon on the studied traits was dose-dependent, so that the application of nano-silicon with 1mM concentration improved growth parameters as well as physiological traits and increased white sugar yield and the maximum dry matter by 20 % and 17%, respectively compared with severe drought stress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, 1 mM nano-silicon increased maximum dry matter by 17% relative to severe drought treatment.

Treatment
nano-silicon with 1mM concentratione0
Outcome
maximum dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
severe drought stress treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of nano-silicon with 1mM concentration improved growth parameters as well as physiological traits and increased white sugar yield and the maximum dry matter by 20 % and 17%, respectively compared with severe drought stress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, 1 mM nano-silicon improved growth parameters and physiological traits.

Treatment
nano-silicon with 1mM concentratione0
Outcome
growth parameters as well as physiological traitse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of nano-silicon with 1mM concentration improved growth parameters as well as physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, 1 mM nano-silicon produced the highest leaf area index, chlorophyll and relative water content.

Treatment
1 mM nano-silicon treatmente0
Outcome
leaf area index, chlorophyll and relative water contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
irrigation at 50% of plant evapotranspiratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under severe drought stress condition (irrigation at 50% of plant evapotranspiration), the highest leaf area index, chlorophyll and relative water content were observed in 1 mM nano-silicon treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, foliar 2 mM nano-silicon adversely affected sugar yield.

Treatment
foliar application of 2 mM nano silicone0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
adverse effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under severe drought stress, foliar application of 2 mM nano silicon had an adverse effect on sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano-silicon and tebuconazole improved dry matter production and sugar yield.

Treatment
combined application of nano-silicon and tebuconazolee0
Outcome
dry matter production and sugar yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of nano-silicon and tebuconazole improved dry matter production and sugar yield by maintaining plant greenness and preventing leaf aging which may indicate an interaction between these two compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that maintaining greenness and preventing leaf aging may explain the combination treatment effect.

Outcome
plant greenness and preventing leaf aginge0
Qualifier
may indicate an interactione0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by maintaining plant greenness and preventing leaf aging which may indicate an interaction between these two compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest nano-silicon and tebuconazole as tools to mitigate drought stress in sugar beet.

Treatment
nano-silicon and tebuconazolee0
Outcome
mitigate the effects of drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nano-silicon and tebuconazole can be used as a suitable tool to mitigate the effects of drought stress on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1932 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.