Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shading gave the highest root fresh weight, length and diameter.

A claim from Study the Losses in Sugar Beet Roots After Harvesting and Reducing it by using Different Storage Methods, Covering and Spraying Treatments during Storage Periods · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading gave the highest root fresh weight, length and diameter.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
root fresh weight/plant, root length and diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–36
e0

“The highest values of root fresh weight/plant, root length and diameter and infestation percentage and lowest root weight loss percentage were recorded when stored under shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–763

Title

Study the Losses in Sugar Beet Roots After Harvesting and Reducing it by using Different Storage Methods, Covering and Spraying Treatments during Storage Periods

Saleh Seadh; M. Abdel-Moneam; M. Ibrahim; et al. Journal of Plant Production 2021. doi:10.21608/jpp.2021.178931

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e2343ae75335f443d318ce8ea17cefa4cea197601dd8c6162d582ce1cf1c68fd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

shade · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Shaded crops had consistently smaller root dry matter and sugar weights at the end of shading and at final harvest in both years.

    Effects of shading and of seasonal differences in weather on the growth, sugar content and sugar yield of sugar‐beet crops · 1972

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Shading did not affect root to shoot ratio.

    Partitioning within the Taproot Sink of Sugarbeet: Effect of Photosynthate Supply1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Shade avoidance cues from surrounding grass reduced B. vulgaris total leaf area by 49% to 66%.

    Shade avoidance cues reduceBeta vulgarisgrowth · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Shade at 80% inhibited Swiss chard growth and development.

    ARTIFICIAL SHADE ADAPTATION AND POPULATION DENSITY ON SWISS CHARD (Beta vulgaris subsp. Cicla (L) W.D.J Koch) IN URBAN AR-EA · 2023

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Artificial shading of the sugar beet canopy decreased overall growth and root weights.

    Evaluation of intercropped sugar beets Beta vulgaris L. with emphasis on competition for light · 1971

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Increasing shade decreased leaf area index, root weight ratio, net assimilation rate and crop growth rate.

    Effects of Shading Densities on the Agronomic and Physiological Characters of Two Sugarbeet Cultivars · 1988 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    After shading ceased, leaf weight recovered and exceeded control at the middle stage.

    Influence of shading treatment on the growth of leaf and root, and sugar accumulation in sugar beet varieties · 1973 · compared with control

    Same direction

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.