Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar application improved sugar lost to molasses, extractability percentages, and yield in both seasons.

A claim from Effect of Foliar Application with Humic Acid Substances under Nitrogen Fertilization Levels on Quality and Yields of Sugar Beet Plant · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application improved sugar lost to molasses, extractability percentages, and yield in both seasons.

Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
sugar lost to molasses, extractability percentages and yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133
e0

“foliar application statistically improved sucrose, extractable sugar, purity, sugar lost to molasses, extractability percentages and yield (tons/ fed) in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–585

Title

Effect of Foliar Application with Humic Acid Substances under Nitrogen Fertilization Levels on Quality and Yields of Sugar Beet Plant

A.S. El-Hassanin; M.R. Samak; Moustafa, N. Shafika; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2016.511.078

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-28c8ff023d061c8bda6d2439ca55fe3b705bc79fdfd86f2118f04bdacabada37 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.