Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest combined treatment gave root yield of 39.77 t/fed.

A claim from EFFECT OF MINERAL, BIO FERTILIZATION, HUMIC ACID AND THEIR INTERACTIONS ON SUGAR BEET · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest combined treatment gave root yield of 39.77 t/fed.

Treatment
highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)e0
Outcome
root yielde0
Value
39.77 t/fede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root yield (39.77 t/fed) and gross sugar yield (7.13t/fed) (fed= feddan= 4200 m2) were obtained by the highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1182
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85

Title

EFFECT OF MINERAL, BIO FERTILIZATION, HUMIC ACID AND THEIR INTERACTIONS ON SUGAR BEET

Ali Abdallah Ali Mekdad Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2017. doi:10.21608/fjard.2017.191250

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-4cdfe112ae8d1e434f07cdf4f3e831a50c538d34ba12e512343f167bcca4041d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Combined inoculation did not alter F113 growth or production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol.

    Combining proteolytic and phloroglucinol‐producing bacteria for improved biocontrol of Pythium ‐mediated damping‐off of sugar beet · 1998

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Biofertilizer alone gave the lowest root and sugar yields.

    Effect of Bio and Mineral Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet in Newly Reclaimed Lands in Egypt · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Biostimulant treatment B3 gave the significantly highest root yield compared with the control.

    Quantity and Quality Changes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris Provar. Altissima Doel) Induced by Different Sources of Biostimulants · 2022 · compared with control type

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Mineral biofertilizer fermented for 20 to 30 days, combined with mineral fertilization at planting, improved beet growth, gas exchange and production.

    Growth, gas exchanges and production of beet CV. katrina under organo-mineral fertilization · 2017

    Same direction

  5. positive
    IAA or Kainten with 75% mineral fertilizer plus Nitrobine achieved the highest sugar beet yield.

    Sugar Beet Yield and Quality As Affected by Growth Regulators, Mineral and Bio-Fertilization in Nubaria Region · 2019

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Beet seedlings produced with bokashi plus biodynamic preparations P502-P507 yielded highly in the field.

    Quality of Bokashi-Type Biofertilizer Formulations and Its Application in the Production of Vegetables in an Ecological System · 2023

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Thiram plus P. fluorescens gave the highest root yield, 85.15 t/ha.

    Effect of bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens and low fungicide dose seed treatments on parasite fungus Aphanomyces cochlioides and sugar beet yield and quality · 2006

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The best combined treatment gave the maximum total benefit cost ratio of 4.32 in table beet.

    Effect of Natural and Bio-Fertilizers on Productivity and Quality of Table Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown in Sandy Soil at Siwa Oasis, Egypt · 2018 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Foliar application improved sugar lost to molasses, extractability percentages, and yield in both seasons.

    Effect of Foliar Application with Humic Acid Substances under Nitrogen Fertilization Levels on Quality and Yields of Sugar Beet Plant · 2016

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Point injection gave the greatest predicted maximum yield in five of six responsive site years.

    Sugarbeet Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency with Preplant Broadcast, Banded, or Point‐Injected Nitrogen Application · 2007

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons

    Response of Sugar Beet to Micronutrients Foliar Spray under Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Doses · 2014

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. no effect
    Spraying with copper or captan did not increase the yield of uninoculated sugar beet plants.

    The control of Alternaria species on leaves of sugar beet infected with yellowing viruses · 1965

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Boron spraying time reportedly had no considerable effect on tops dry weight, sugar loss %, sugar loss yield and some impurity concentrations.

    Effect Concentration and Spraying Time of Boron on Yield and Quality Traits of Sugar Beet Grown in Newly Reclaimed Soil Conditions · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Daminozide did not affect plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.

    Harvesting sugar-beet seed · 1974

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Foliar insecticides had little or no effect on root yield.

    Foliar insecticides for the control of curly top in Idaho sugar beet, 2017 · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Delaying foliar yeast spraying from 60 to 70 and 90 days after sowing decreased root and sugar yields.

    EFFECT OF FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION DATES OF YEAST (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) ON SUGAR BEET PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY · 2015

    Opposite direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    first 112 kg N ha −1 increased root yield by 11.8 Mg ha −1.

    Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Sugar Beet Yield and Quality Early in Harvest · 1995

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Nitrogen at 72 kg N/fed significantly maximized root and sugar yields.

    Effect of Foliar Application with Humic Acid Substances under Nitrogen Fertilization Levels on Quality and Yields of Sugar Beet Plant · 2016

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons

    Response of Sugar Beet to Micronutrients Foliar Spray under Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Doses · 2014

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. negative
    Inorganic nitrogen above 112 kg/ha progressively decreased sucrose yields.

    Long‐term Nitrogen Rates and Sources Influence Sugarbeet Yield and Quality1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen did not affect root yield in any year.

    The effects on growth, development and yield of sugar beet of extension of the growth period by transplantation · 1966

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    N rate did not affect sugar beet yields in either study year.

    Effects of Manure History and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Sugar Beet Production in the Northwest US · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    High N rates resulted in lower sugar yields and juice purity in sugar beets.

    Yield and Sugar Production by Sugar Beets as Affected by Leaf Area Variations Induced by Stand Density and Nitrogen Fertilization1 · 1967

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Sugarbeet yield was similar between supplemental nitrogen methods at each N rate and irrigation regime.

    Sugarbeet Response to Incremental Application of Nitrogen with High Frequency Sprinkler Irrigation · 1981

    Opposite direction

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.