Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Bio and Mineral Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet in Newly Reclaimed Lands in Egypt

Ismail F. Sayed-Ahmed; Ranya M. Abdel Aziz; Sahar H. Rashed

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to study the overall impact of biofertilization (control, Microbin, Rhizobacterin, Phosphorin and four combinations) and the mineral nitrogen fertilizer levels (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg N/fed.*) on yield and quality of sugar beet. This investigation was conducted during 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 seasons at the experimental at Kalabsho (31°25’ E and 23°31’ N), El-Dakhlia Governorate, Northeast Delta. A split plot design with four replications was used. Results indicated that, using only biofertilizer gave the lowest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight and top fresh weight/g as well as root and sugar yields. While, using bio fertilizer with mixed Microbeen + Rhizobacterin led to increase in values of mentioned rails on the other direction. Addition Phosphorin to any kind of bio fertilizers (Microbeen or Rhizobacterin) did not give any significant increase in all traits under study. Mineral nitrogen fertilizer at high levels 80 or 120 kg N/fed. have a significant increase in most characters under study. Generally, it could be concluded that application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed. as a mineral fertilization for maximizing sugar beet productivity under the environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer alone gave the lowest root and top growth measurements and root and sugar yields.

Treatment
only biofertilizere0
Outcome
root length, root diameter, root fresh weight and top fresh weight/ge0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using only biofertilizer gave the lowest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight and top fresh weight/g as well as root and sugar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer alone gave the lowest root and sugar yields.

Treatment
only biofertilizere0
Outcome
root and sugar yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using only biofertilizer gave the lowest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight and top fresh weight/g as well as root and sugar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed Microbeen and Rhizobacterin increased the reported growth and yield measures.

Treatment
mixed Microbeen + Rhizobacterine0
Outcome
mentioned railse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using bio fertilizer with mixed Microbeen + Rhizobacterin led to increase in values of mentioned rails on the other direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Phosphorin to Microbeen or Rhizobacterin gave no significant increase in studied traits.

Treatment
Addition Phosphorin to any kind of bio fertilizerse0
Outcome
all traits under studye0
Direction
did not give any significant increasee0
Comparator
Microbeen or Rhizobacterine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition Phosphorin to any kind of bio fertilizers (Microbeen or Rhizobacterin) did not give any significant increase in all traits under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 80 or 120 kg N/fed. significantly increased most studied characters.

Treatment
Mineral nitrogen fertilizer at high levels 80 or 120 kg N/fed.e0
Outcome
most characters under studye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral nitrogen fertilizer at high levels 80 or 120 kg N/fed. have a significant increase in most characters under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended combined biofertilizers and 120 kg N/fed. to maximize sugar beet productivity.

Treatment
application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed. as a mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
maximizing sugar beet productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed. as a mineral fertilization for maximizing sugar beet productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 25 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.