Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted during 2014/15 and2015/16 seasons to study the effect of three mineral nitrogen fertilizer levelsi.e., 60, 90 and 120 kg N/fed and four biofertilization (withoutbiofertilization, rhizobactrein, phosphorein and dual inoculation) and threefoliar spraying levels with humic acid (water as a control, 12 and 24 g/l) onyield and its attributes of sugar beet variety Kawemira. The experimentaldesign was a split-split plot in RCBD with three replications where mineralnitrogen fertilizer, biofertilization and foliar spraying with humic acid wereallocated in the main, sub and sub-sub plots, respectively.Results indicated that mineral nitrogen fertilizer andbiofertilization with foliar spraying with humic acid had significant positiveeffect on yield, yield components and quality traits. The heaviest root freshweight (2.17 kg/plant), root yield (39.77 t/fed) and gross sugar yield (7.13t/fed) (fed= feddan= 4200 m2) were obtained by the highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l).The results of regression analysis of yield and its attributesclarified that, there were four traits i.e. sucrose %, root yield, root length androot fresh weight in the first season, while in the second season, the sametraits except root length were significantly (P ≤ 0.001) contributed tovariation in gross sugar yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined mineral nitrogen, biofertilization and humic acid spraying positively affected sugar beet yield components and quality traits.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- mineral nitrogen fertilizer andbiofertilization with foliar spraying with humic acide0
- Outcome
- yield, yield components and quality traitse0
- Direction
- positiveeffecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mineral nitrogen fertilizer andbiofertilization with foliar spraying with humic acid had significant positiveeffect on yield, yield components and quality traits”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest combined treatment gave root fresh weight of 2.17 kg/plant.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)e0
- Outcome
- root freshweighte0
- Direction
- heavieste0
- Value
- 2.17 kg/plante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The heaviest root freshweight (2.17 kg/plant), root yield (39.77 t/fed) and gross sugar yield (7.13t/fed) (fed= feddan= 4200 m2) were obtained by the highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest combined treatment gave root yield of 39.77 t/fed.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)e0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Value
- 39.77 t/fede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield (39.77 t/fed) and gross sugar yield (7.13t/fed) (fed= feddan= 4200 m2) were obtained by the highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest combined treatment gave gross sugar yield of 7.13t/fed.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)e0
- Outcome
- gross sugar yielde0
- Value
- 7.13t/fede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gross sugar yield (7.13t/fed) (fed= feddan= 4200 m2) were obtained by the highest level of mineralnitrogen fertilizer (120 kg N/fed), with application the mixture ofrhizobactrein+ phosphorein as biofertilization with the highest concentrationof foliar sprayed with humic acid (24 g/l)”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →other · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →application · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →inoculation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.