Claim · model-written summary
Copper sprays did not affect beet processing quality, including where yield responses were large.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarise0 - Treatment
- Cu sprayse0
- Outcome
- beet processing qualitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Qualifier
- even when large yield responses were obtainede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cu sprays did not affect beet processing quality, even when large yield responses were obtained.”
Title
Responses of Sugar Beet Beta vulgaris to Foliar Sprays of Copper
Marc F Allison; Peter J Last; Kathy M R Bean Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199610)72:2<219::aid-jsfa642>3.3.co;2-5
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Copper sprays did not affect sugar beet yields on peat soils.
- Intervention effect Copper sprays increased sugar beet yield on two light textured mineral soils.
- Association Soil EDTA extractable copper showed no clear relationship with yield response to added copper.
- Intervention effect Copper formulation had little effect on sugar beet yield.
- Intervention effect Wetter and adjuvant treatments had little difference in sugar beet yield.
- Observation An analysis estimated that copper deficiency could affect 15% of the UK sugar beet crop.