Abstract
WO FIELD experiments conducted during 2013/14 and 2014/15 …....seasons to study the effect of three potassium levels i.e., 0 (K1), 25 (K2) and 50 (K3) kg K/fed and five foliar spraying with mixture of micronutrients (B+Zn) T1, (B+Mn) T2, (Zn+Mn) T3, (B+Zn+Mn) T4 and (water as a control) T5 on yield and its attributes of two sugar beet varieties i.e., Farida (V1) and Demo (V2). The experimental design was a split-split plot in RCBD with three replications where varieties, potassium levels, and micronutrients were allocated in the main, sub and sub-sub plots, respectively. Results indicated that potassium and foliar spray with micronutrients mixture fertilization had a highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) positive effect on yield, yield components, and quality traits, varieties differed significantly in root length, root fresh weight, yields in terms of root, top biological, gross sugar and extractable sugar, as well as harvest index in both seasons. The highest yields of root and top were 53.25 & 49.96, 15.21 and 15.55 t/fad (fad= faddan= 4200 m2) in both seasons, respectively as well as, root fresh weight (2661.50 g/plant) and extractable sugar yield (12.67 t/fad) in the first season were obtained by Demo (V2) variety with 50 kg K/fad (K3) with mixture of micronutrients B+Zn+Mn (M4). Correlation analysis revealed the presence of highly significant r values between gross sugar yield with each of root yield and gross sugar (%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and foliar micronutrient fertilization had a highly significant positive effect on sugar beet yield, yield components and quality traits compared with water spraying.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- potassium and foliar spray with micronutrients mixture fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yield, yield components, and quality traitse0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Comparator
- water as a controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated that potassium and foliar spray with micronutrients mixture fertilization had a highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) positive effect on yield, yield components, and quality traits”
e1“(water as a control) T5”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
The two sugar beet varieties differed significantly in root length and root fresh weight.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Farida (V1) and Demo (V2)e3
- Outcome
- root length, root fresh weighte2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“varieties differed significantly in root length, root fresh weight, yields in terms of root, top biological, gross sugar and extractable sugar, as well as harvest index in both seasons”
e3“two sugar beet varieties i.e., Farida (V1) and Demo (V2)”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
Demo (V2) with 50 kg K/fad and micronutrients B+Zn+Mn gave the highest root yield, 53.25 and 49.96.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Demo (V2)e5
- Outcome
- yields of roote4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 53.25 & 49.96e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The highest yields of root and top were 53.25 & 49.96, 15.21 and 15.55 t/fad (fad= faddan= 4200 m2) in both seasons”
e5“obtained by Demo (V2) variety with 50 kg K/fad (K3) with mixture of micronutrients B+Zn+Mn (M4)”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
Demo (V2) with 50 kg K/fad and micronutrients B+Zn+Mn gave the highest top yield, 15.21 and 15.55.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Demo (V2)e5
- Outcome
- tope4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 15.21 and 15.55e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The highest yields of root and top were 53.25 & 49.96, 15.21 and 15.55 t/fad (fad= faddan= 4200 m2) in both seasons”
e5“obtained by Demo (V2) variety with 50 kg K/fad (K3) with mixture of micronutrients B+Zn+Mn (M4)”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
Root fresh weight of Demo (V2) was 2661.50 g per plant in the first season.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Demo (V2)e5
- Outcome
- root fresh weighte6
- Value
- 2661.50 g/plante6
- Qualifier
- first seasone6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“root fresh weight (2661.50 g/plant) and extractable sugar yield (12.67 t/fad) in the first season”
e5“obtained by Demo (V2) variety with 50 kg K/fad (K3) with mixture of micronutrients B+Zn+Mn (M4)”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
Extractable sugar yield of Demo (V2) was 12.67 t/fad in the first season.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Demo (V2)e5
- Outcome
- extractable sugar yielde6
- Value
- 12.67 t/fade6
- Qualifier
- first seasone6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“root fresh weight (2661.50 g/plant) and extractable sugar yield (12.67 t/fad) in the first season”
e5“obtained by Demo (V2) variety with 50 kg K/fad (K3) with mixture of micronutrients B+Zn+Mn (M4)”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross sugar yield was significantly correlated with root yield and gross sugar percentage.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- gross sugar yielde7
- Comparator
- root yielde7
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Correlation analysis revealed the presence of highly significant r values between gross sugar yield with each of root yield and gross sugar (%)”
t0“Performance of Two Sugar Beet Varieties under Fertilization with Potassium and Foliar Spraying with Micronutrients”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →application · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.