Paper · 1970 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Sodium and potassium relationships in sugar beet

A. P. Draycott; J. A. P. Marsh; P. B. H. Tinker

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Three field experiments with sugar beet grown on a light calcareous soil tested a wide range of amounts of sodium and potassium fertilizer with either magnesium or nitrogen. Both sodium and potassium increased sugar yield and there was a large negative interaction between them. Magnesium also increased sugar yield, but the larger dressing of nitrogen decreased it. Sodium, potassium and nitrogen fertilizers also affected the concentration of impurities in the root juice at harvest. Plant samples were also analysed in August when the crop usually contains most sodium. Sodium fertilizer greatly increased the sodium and decreased the potassium concentration in the dry matter of the tops but the composition of the roots changed little. Potassium dressings slightly increased potassium in the tops but did not affect the root composition. Exchangeable sodium in the top soil of plots given sodium fertilizer decreased rapidly early in the season, but increased again from August, probably because sodium was taken up rapidly early in the summer and returned later in dead leaves. Soil potassium decreased throughout the season on plots where potassium was applied, but did not change on plots without potassium fertilizer; this is explained by fixation and release from non-exchangeable forms. On this soil there was no reason to regard sodium in its effect on yield, other than as a replacement for potassium, but its behaviour in the soil and effect on the composition of the plant was quite different.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium fertilizer increased sugar beet sugar yield.

Treatment
sodiume1
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both sodium and potassium increased sugar yield and there was a large negative interaction between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilizer increased sugar beet sugar yield.

Treatment
potassiume1
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both sodium and potassium increased sugar yield and there was a large negative interaction between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–285 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium and potassium fertilizers had a large negative interaction on sugar beet sugar yield.

Treatment
sodium and potassiume1
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
large negative interactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both sodium and potassium increased sugar yield and there was a large negative interaction between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium fertilizer increased sugar beet sugar yield.

Treatment
Magnesiume2
Outcome
sugar yielde2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e2

“Magnesium also increased sugar yield, but the larger dressing of nitrogen decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A larger nitrogen dressing decreased sugar beet sugar yield.

Treatment
larger dressing of nitrogene2
Outcome
sugar yielde2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e2

“Magnesium also increased sugar yield, but the larger dressing of nitrogen decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium fertilizer affected the concentration of impurities in sugar beet root juice at harvest.

Treatment
Sodiume3
Outcome
concentration of impurities in the root juicee3
Direction
affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sodium, potassium and nitrogen fertilizers also affected the concentration of impurities in the root juice at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilizer affected the concentration of impurities in sugar beet root juice at harvest.

Treatment
potassiume3
Outcome
concentration of impurities in the root juicee3
Direction
affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sodium, potassium and nitrogen fertilizers also affected the concentration of impurities in the root juice at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers affected the concentration of impurities in sugar beet root juice at harvest.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse3
Outcome
concentration of impurities in the root juicee3
Direction
affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sodium, potassium and nitrogen fertilizers also affected the concentration of impurities in the root juice at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium fertilizer greatly increased sodium in the dry matter of sugar beet tops.

Organ / stage
dry matter of the topse4
Treatment
Sodium fertilizere4
Outcome
sodiume4
Direction
greatly increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sodium fertilizer greatly increased the sodium and decreased the potassium concentration in the dry matter of the tops but the composition of the roots changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium fertilizer decreased potassium concentration in the dry matter of sugar beet tops.

Organ / stage
dry matter of the topse4
Treatment
Sodium fertilizere4
Outcome
potassium concentratione4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sodium fertilizer greatly increased the sodium and decreased the potassium concentration in the dry matter of the tops but the composition of the roots changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium fertilizer changed the composition of sugar beet roots little.

Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
Sodium fertilizere4
Outcome
composition of the rootse4
Direction
changed littlee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sodium fertilizer greatly increased the sodium and decreased the potassium concentration in the dry matter of the tops but the composition of the roots changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium dressings slightly increased potassium in sugar beet tops.

Organ / stage
topse5
Treatment
Potassium dressingse5
Outcome
potassiume5
Direction
slightly increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“Potassium dressings slightly increased potassium in the tops but did not affect the root composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium dressings did not affect the root composition of sugar beet.

Treatment
Potassium dressingse5
Outcome
root compositione5
Direction
did not affecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“Potassium dressings slightly increased potassium in the tops but did not affect the root composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable sodium in the top soil of sodium-fertilized plots decreased rapidly early in the season.

Organ / stage
top soile6
Treatment
sodium fertilizere6
Outcome
Exchangeable sodiume6
Direction
decreased rapidlye6
Qualifier
early in the seasone6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“Exchangeable sodium in the top soil of plots given sodium fertilizer decreased rapidly early in the season, but increased again from August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable sodium in the top soil of sodium-fertilized plots increased again from August.

Organ / stage
top soile6
Treatment
sodium fertilizere6
Outcome
Exchangeable sodiume6
Direction
increased againe6
Qualifier
from Auguste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“Exchangeable sodium in the top soil of plots given sodium fertilizer decreased rapidly early in the season, but increased again from August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium decreased throughout the season on plots where potassium was applied.

Treatment
potassiume7
Outcome
Soil potassiume7
Direction
decreasede7
Qualifier
throughout the seasone7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil potassium decreased throughout the season on plots where potassium was applied, but did not change on plots without potassium fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium did not change on plots without potassium fertilizer.

Treatment
potassiume7
Outcome
Soil potassiume7
Direction
did not changee7
Qualifier
on plots without potassium fertilizere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil potassium decreased throughout the season on plots where potassium was applied, but did not change on plots without potassium fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1233 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The decline of soil potassium under potassium fertilization is explained by fixation and release from non-exchangeable forms.

Outcome
Soil potassiume7
Qualifier
fixation and release from non-exchangeable formse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil potassium decreased throughout the season on plots where potassium was applied, but did not change on plots without potassium fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1233 · show in text ↑
e6

“this is explained by fixation and release from non-exchangeable forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1304 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

On this soil, sodium affects sugar beet yield only as a replacement for potassium.

Treatment
sodiume5
Outcome
effect on yielde5
Qualifier
as a replacement for potassiume5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments with sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“On this soil there was no reason to regard sodium in its effect on yield, other than as a replacement for potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1421 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

magnesium atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

potassium · soil: chemistry · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.