Paper · 2014 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS, PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER AND SPRAYING WITH SOME NUTRIENTS UNDER NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET (BETA VULGARIS L.)

Sahar F. Tawfic

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field studies were conducted in 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 growing seasons at Nubaria city Alexandria Governorate, Egypt during the two successive seasons, using sugar beet cultivar pleno to asses the effects of planting methods, phosphorus fertilizer management and spraying with some nutrients on sugar beet yield and quality. Split- split plot design was used with four replicates. The plot area was 27 m2. The main plots were assigned to two seedling methods 1- Manual planting, and 2- Mechanical planting. The sub plots were assigned to two times for phosphorus fertilizer application:- 1-Application of the recommended phosphorus fertilizer as one dose before the planting 2- Application of the phosphorus as two equal doses, the first before the planting and the second one month after sowing. The sub- sub plots were assigned to four nutrient spraying 1- Water as control, 2- Magnesium (400 mg L-1) as MgSO4, 3- Boron, (150 mg L-1) as boric acid and 4- Spraying with solution contain 150 mg L-1 boron + 400 mg L-1 magnesium. The obtained results can be summarized as follows:- Mechanical planting method, application of phosphorus fertilizer at two equal doses and spraying with B + Mg for sugar beet planting gave the highest values of root length, root fresh weight, root yield, sugar yield and sucrose % where as root diameter and top yield gave the highest values with manual planting and addition phosphorus fertilizer at one dose during land preparation, while addition some nutrients had no effected on top yields at two growing seasons. On the other hand migration coefficient not affected in both seasons by factors under study. Impurities values were affected significantly by manual planting and addition phosphorus as one dose in both seasons while, some nutrients not affected on impurities values in both seasons and recorded the highest values. Quality % and extractable sugar (ton/fed.) recorded the highest values in both seasons when sugar beet plants were sowed mechanically and phosphorus was added at two equal doses where as, addition B + Mg alone or mixture not affected on these traits in the first seasons only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical planting, split phosphorus and B + Mg spray gave the highest root length, root fresh weight, root yield, sugar yield and sucrose percentage.

Treatment
Mechanical planting method, application of phosphorus fertilizer at two equal doses and spraying with B + Mge0
Outcome
root length, root fresh weight, root yield, sugar yield and sucrose %e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical planting method, application of phosphorus fertilizer at two equal doses and spraying with B + Mg for sugar beet planting gave the highest values of root length, root fresh weight, root yield, sugar yield and sucrose %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual planting and a single phosphorus dose gave the highest root diameter and top yield.

Treatment
manual planting and addition phosphorus fertilizer at one dosee0
Outcome
root diameter and top yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root diameter and top yield gave the highest values with manual planting and addition phosphorus fertilizer at one dose during land preparation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient additions did not affect top yield in either season.

Treatment
addition some nutrientse0
Outcome
top yieldse0
Direction
no effectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition some nutrients had no effected on top yields at two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied factors did not affect migration coefficient in either season.

Treatment
factors under studye0
Outcome
migration coefficiente0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“migration coefficient not affected in both seasons by factors under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual planting and one phosphorus dose significantly affected impurities values.

Treatment
manual planting and addition phosphorus as one dosee0
Outcome
Impurities valuese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Impurities values were affected significantly by manual planting and addition phosphorus as one dose in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1763 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient sprays did not affect impurities values in either season.

Treatment
some nutrientse0
Outcome
impurities valuese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some nutrients not affected on impurities values in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical sowing and split phosphorus yielded the highest quality percentage and extractable sugar in both seasons.

Treatment
sowed mechanically and phosphorus was added at two equal dosese0
Outcome
Quality % and extractable sugar (ton/fed.)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality % and extractable sugar (ton/fed.) recorded the highest values in both seasons when sugar beet plants were sowed mechanically and phosphorus was added at two equal doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–2046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B + Mg alone or mixed did not affect quality percentage and extractable sugar in the first season.

Treatment
addition B + Mg alone or mixturee0
Outcome
Quality % and extractable sugar (ton/fed.)e1
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition B + Mg alone or mixture not affected on these traits in the first seasons only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality % and extractable sugar (ton/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1911 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–158 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

magnesium atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.