Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Production

INFLUENCE OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF SOME MICRONUTRIENTS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS.

A. Osman

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted during 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 seasons in Nubaria Research Station. Alexandria Governorate. The major goal was to study the effect of nine treatments which represented the combination between three foliar spray of some micronutrients solution levels (1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 /300 L water/fed) at 45 and 75 days from sowing and three nitrogen fertilizer levels of (80, 100 and 120 Kg/fed). A split plot design with four replications was used. The main plots were assigned to foliar spray with some micronutrients solution, whereas, nitrogen fertilizer in the sub plots. The obtained results revealed that: foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fed attained a highest values for root diameter and fresh weight/plant, as well as, sucrose%, purity%, root and sugar yields/fed. While, N, Na and K% were decreased in both seasons. Foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 3/4 l/fed increased root length and macroelements (g/100 g DW) in both seasons. Application of nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fed gave the highest mean values of root length, diameter, fresh weight/plant, root and sugar yields/fed. On the contrary, a gradual reduction in sucrose% and purity% had been detected with the increase in nitrogen level over 80 kg N/fed. Interaction between foliar spray of some micronutrients solution levels 1/2 l/fed and nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg/fed significantly affected on sucrose%, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray at 1/2 l/fed gave the highest root diameter and fresh weight per plant.

Treatment
foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fede0
Outcome
root diameter and fresh weight/plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fed attained a highest values for root diameter and fresh weight/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray at 1/2 l/fed gave the highest sucrose and purity percentages.

Treatment
foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fede0
Outcome
sucrose%, purity%e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fed attained a highest values for root diameter and fresh weight/plant, as well as, sucrose%, purity%, root and sugar yields/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray at 1/2 l/fed gave the highest root and sugar yields.

Treatment
foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fede0
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fed attained a highest values for root diameter and fresh weight/plant, as well as, sucrose%, purity%, root and sugar yields/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray at 1/2 l/fed decreased N, Na, and K percentages in both seasons.

Treatment
foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fede1
Outcome
N, Na and K%e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, Na and K% were decreased in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 1/2 l/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray at 3/4 l/fed increased root length in both seasons.

Treatment
Foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 3/4 l/fede0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 3/4 l/fed increased root length and macroelements (g/100 g DW) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray at 3/4 l/fed increased macroelement content in both seasons.

Treatment
Foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 3/4 l/fede0
Outcome
macroelementse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of micronutrients solution level at 3/4 l/fed increased root length and macroelements (g/100 g DW) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fed gave the highest root length, diameter, and fresh weight per plant.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fede0
Outcome
root length, diameter, fresh weight/plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fed gave the highest mean values of root length, diameter, fresh weight/plant, root and sugar yields/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fed gave the highest root and sugar yields.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fede0
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N/fed gave the highest mean values of root length, diameter, fresh weight/plant, root and sugar yields/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen above 80 kg N/fed progressively reduced sucrose and purity percentages.

Treatment
increase in nitrogen level over 80 kg N/fede0
Outcome
sucrose% and purity%e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a gradual reduction in sucrose% and purity% had been detected with the increase in nitrogen level over 80 kg N/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 1/2 l/fed micronutrient spray and 120 kg/fed nitrogen significantly affected sucrose percentage and root and sugar yields in both seasons.

Treatment
foliar spray of some micronutrients solution levels 1/2 l/fed and nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg/fede0
Outcome
sucrose%, root and sugar yields/fede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction between foliar spray of some micronutrients solution levels 1/2 l/fed and nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg/fed significantly affected on sucrose%, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–102 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 97 positive, 12 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.