Paper · 2008 · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment

Effects of complete micronutrients and their application method on root yield and sugar content of sugar beet cv. Rassoul

Mehrdad Yarnia; M B Khorshidi Benam; Hamdullah Kazemi Arbat; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of micronutrients on some attributes of mono-germ sugar beet cv. Rassoul an experiment was conducted in factorial arrangement, on the basis of randomized complete block design with three replications during growing season of 2004. Treatments were six levels of micronutrients (control, ZnSO 4 , MnSO 4 , H 3 BO 3 , FeSO 4 and complete micronutrients) and three methods of application (spraying the seeds with micronutrients, applying directly to soil and leaves). Analysis of data showed that all three methods of micronutrients application, due to increase in NAR and LAI, increased root yield, harvest index and sugar and dry matter percentages. It was also revealed that foliar application of the rest of micronutrients increased root yield and sugar content significantly. Highest root yields (75 and 74.45 tons per hectare) were obtained when leaves were sprayed with Fe and complete micronutrients were applied to soil, respectively. The percentages of sugar and dry matter were 18.32 and 19.44% when the seeds were sprayed with Zn. Harvest index increased appreciably, from 53% in control treatment to 72%, when Mn was used. It can be concluded that all three methods of applying micronutrients resulted in higher values of LAI and NAR and thus in higher sugar percent and beet root yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three micronutrient application methods increased NAR and LAI.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
all three methods of micronutrients applicatione0
Outcome
NAR and LAIe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three methods of micronutrients application, due to increase in NAR and LAI, increased root yield, harvest index and sugar and dry matter percentages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three micronutrient application methods increased root yield and harvest index.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
all three methods of micronutrients applicatione0
Outcome
root yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three methods of micronutrients application, due to increase in NAR and LAI, increased root yield, harvest index and sugar and dry matter percentages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three application methods increased sugar and dry matter percentages.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
all three methods of micronutrients applicatione0
Outcome
sugar and dry matter percentagese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three methods of micronutrients application, due to increase in NAR and LAI, increased root yield, harvest index and sugar and dry matter percentages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar micronutrient application significantly increased root yield and sugar content.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
foliar application of the rest of micronutrientse0
Outcome
root yield and sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of the rest of micronutrients increased root yield and sugar content significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe gave the highest root yield, 75 tons per hectare.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
leaves were sprayed with Fee0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
75e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest root yields (75 and 74.45 tons per hectare) were obtained when leaves were sprayed with Fe and complete micronutrients were applied to soil, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied complete micronutrients gave 74.45 tons per hectare root yield.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
complete micronutrients were applied to soile0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
74.45 tons per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest root yields (75 and 74.45 tons per hectare) were obtained when leaves were sprayed with Fe and complete micronutrients were applied to soil, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn seed spraying gave 18.32% sugar.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
seeds were sprayed with Zne0
Outcome
percentages of sugare0
Value
18.32e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentages of sugar and dry matter were 18.32 and 19.44% when the seeds were sprayed with Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1062 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn seed spraying gave 19.44% dry matter.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
seeds were sprayed with Zne0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
19.44%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentages of sugar and dry matter were 18.32 and 19.44% when the seeds were sprayed with Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn increased harvest index from 53% in control to 72%.

Taxon
sugar beet cv. RassoulBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment
Mn was usede0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
53%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet cv. Rassoul”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Harvest index increased appreciably, from 53% in control treatment to 72%, when Mn was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1155 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.