Abstract
THE PRESENT investigation was carried out at the Experimental Farm of Sakha Agricultural Research Station, ARC, atKafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt during 2012/2013and 2013/2014 seasons. Two field experiments were conducted to study the effect of different foliar spraying treatments, i.e., spraying with distilled water, spraying with micronutrients mixture once after 60 days from sowing and twice after, 60 and 75 days from sowing and four nitrogen rates, i.e., 60, 75, 90 and 105 kg N/fad ( as soil application ) on yield, yield components and quality of sugar beet as well as to minimizing costs of mineral fertilization and environmental pollution. The experimental design was split plot design with three replications. The main results of this investigation clear that nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixture significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons. The inverse was true in TSS, sucrose and juice purity percentages. Whereas, raising soil application of nitrogen from 60 to 105 kg N/fad and foliar spraying with micronutrients mixture caused a marked decrease in the previously mentioned traits. Generally, it can be concluded that soil application of nitrogen fertilizer at the rate of 105 kg N/fad and foliar spraying sugar beet plants twicely with micronutrients mixture could be recommended for optimum root and sugar yield per unit area.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixturee1
- Outcome
- root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons”
e1“nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixture significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons.”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixturee1
- Outcome
- top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fade0
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons”
e1“nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixture significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons.”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The inverse was true in TSS, sucrose and juice purity percentages.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixturee1
- Outcome
- TSS, sucrose and juice purity percentagese0
- Direction
- inversee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inverse was true in TSS, sucrose and juice purity percentages.”
e1“nitrogen fertilizer up to 105 kg N/fad and foliar twice with micronutrients mixture significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, top and root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad in both seasons.”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
soil application of nitrogen fertilizer at the rate of 105 kg N/fad and foliar spraying sugar beet plants twicely with micronutrients mixture could be recommended for optimum root and sugar yield per unit area
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- soil application of nitrogen fertilizer at the rate of 105 kg N/fad and foliar spraying sugar beet plants twicely with micronutrients mixturee0
- Outcome
- optimum root and sugar yield per unit areae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil application of nitrogen fertilizer at the rate of 105 kg N/fad and foliar spraying sugar beet plants twicely with micronutrients mixture could be recommended for optimum root and sugar yield per unit area”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →micronutrient · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.