Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatments increased sugar yield per feddan.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatments increased sugar yield per feddan.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen fertilizer as soil application up to 90 kg N/fed. and repeating foliar application with urea solutione0
Outcome
sugar yield/fed.e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen fertilizer as soil application up to 90 kg N/fed. and repeating foliar application with urea solution significantly increased root length and diameter, dry matter accumulation/plant, root and top yields/fed. as well as sugar yield/fed. in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–1009
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77

Title

EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET

E. Nemeat Alla,; A. Mohamed; S. Zalat Journal of Plant Production 2002. doi:10.21608/jpp.2002.253465

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-2f4b72c19ef4e16e5795276521ac164a522d63d476d1eb30027c9dfc86555df2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.