Paper · 1978 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of N Fertilization on Sugarbeet Crown Tissue Production and Processing Quality1

A. D. Halvorson; G. P. Hartman; D. F. Cole; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Over the past 4 decades, sucrose content of sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.) has decreased while root yield has increased. Reasons reported include processing of more crown material, because mechanical harvesting removes less crown tissue than hand‐topping methods, and incre ased use of N fertilizer. Our objective was to determine the relationship between N application rate and sugarbeet crown tissue production, and its effects on processing quality of sugarbeets. Reported are the results of two studies conducted in 1975 and one in 1976, each using a different sugarbeet cultivar and seven N rates. Green petiole material was removed before each sugarbeet was sectioned into root and crown tissues for yield and quality analyses. Crown tissue increased linearly as rates of N application increased. Root tissue and recoverable sucrose yields were near maximum when spring soil NO 3 ‐N or soil NO 3 ‐N plus added N reached 200 to 225 kg/ha. At higher N levels, crown tissue yield increased and sucrose content in both root and crown tissues decreased, offsetting any potential benefits from increased whole beet yield. When N was adequate for maximmn sucrose production, crown tissue contributed approximately 20% of the total recoverable sucrose per ha. As N rate increased, sucrose concentration, extractable sucrose per metric ton, and purity decreased whereas Na, K, amino‐N, invert sugar, and imaturity index values increased for both root and crown tissues. Root tissue always had higher levels than crown tissue of extractable sucrose and purity and lower levels of Na, amino‐N, invert sugar, and impurity index. Crown tissue production can be minimized, and processing quality of sngarbeets can be improved by conservative use of N fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown tissue increased linearly as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
rates of N applicatione0
Outcome
Crown tissuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crown tissue increased linearly as rates of N application increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tissue yield was near its maximum at 200 to 225 kg/ha soil nitrate nitrogen plus added nitrogen.

Treatment
soil NO 3 ‐N plus added Ne0
Outcome
Root tissuee0
Direction
near maximume0
Value
200 to 225 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tissue and recoverable sucrose yields were near maximum when spring soil NO 3 ‐N or soil NO 3 ‐N plus added N reached 200 to 225 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recoverable sucrose yield was near its maximum at 200 to 225 kg/ha soil nitrate nitrogen plus added nitrogen.

Treatment
soil NO 3 ‐N plus added Ne0
Outcome
recoverable sucrose yieldse0
Direction
near maximume0
Value
200 to 225 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tissue and recoverable sucrose yields were near maximum when spring soil NO 3 ‐N or soil NO 3 ‐N plus added N reached 200 to 225 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher nitrogen levels, crown tissue yield increased.

Treatment
higher N levelse0
Outcome
crown tissue yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher N levels, crown tissue yield increased and sucrose content in both root and crown tissues decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher nitrogen levels, sucrose content in root and crown tissue decreased.

Treatment
higher N levelse0
Outcome
sucrose content in both root and crown tissuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher N levels, crown tissue yield increased and sucrose content in both root and crown tissues decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate nitrogen for maximum sucrose production, crown tissue provided about 20% of recoverable sucrose per hectare.

Organ / stage
crown tissuee0
Outcome
total recoverable sucrose per hae0
Value
approximately 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When N was adequate for maximmn sucrose production, crown tissue contributed approximately 20% of the total recoverable sucrose per ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As nitrogen increased, sucrose concentration, extractable sucrose and purity decreased in roots and crowns.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
sucrose concentration, extractable sucrose per metric ton, and puritye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As N rate increased, sucrose concentration, extractable sucrose per metric ton, and purity decreased whereas Na, K, amino‐N, invert sugar, and imaturity index values increased for both root and crown tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As nitrogen increased, sodium, potassium and amino nitrogen increased in roots and crowns.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Na, K, amino‐Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As N rate increased, sucrose concentration, extractable sucrose per metric ton, and purity decreased whereas Na, K, amino‐N, invert sugar, and imaturity index values increased for both root and crown tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As nitrogen increased, invert sugar and immaturity index increased in roots and crowns.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
invert sugar, and imaturity index valuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As N rate increased, sucrose concentration, extractable sucrose per metric ton, and purity decreased whereas Na, K, amino‐N, invert sugar, and imaturity index values increased for both root and crown tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tissue had more extractable sucrose and higher purity than crown tissue.

Organ / stage
Root tissuee0
Outcome
extractable sucrose and puritye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
crown tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tissue always had higher levels than crown tissue of extractable sucrose and purity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1564 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tissue had less sodium, amino nitrogen and invert sugar than crown tissue.

Organ / stage
Root tissuee0
Outcome
Na, amino‐N, invert sugare0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
crown tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tissue always had higher levels than crown tissue of extractable sucrose and purity and lower levels of Na, amino‐N, invert sugar, and impurity index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1631 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tissue had a lower impurity index than crown tissue.

Organ / stage
Root tissuee0
Outcome
impurity indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
crown tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tissue always had higher levels than crown tissue of extractable sucrose and purity and lower levels of Na, amino‐N, invert sugar, and impurity index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1631 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conservative nitrogen use to minimize crowns and improve processing quality.

Outcome
conservative use of N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crown tissue production can be minimized, and processing quality of sngarbeets can be improved by conservative use of N fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1763 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–83 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.