nitrogen · Molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)
84 claims from these papers; 31 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
31 citations between these papers: 10 on the same side, 21 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 29
Accumulation of Oxalate in Tissues of Sugar-beet, and the Effect of Nitrogen Supply · 1964
- positive
Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Sugar Beet Yield and Quality Early in Harvest · 1995
- positive
Production of Betacyanins by a Cell Suspension Culture of Table Beet (Beta vulgarisL.) · 2000
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Influence of Nitrogen Sources on Sucrose Synthetase(SS) in Sugar Beet · 2001
- positive
IMPACT OF NITROGEN LEVELS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET INTERCROPPED WITH FABA BEAN AND WHEAT · 2007
- positive
SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS · 2007
- positive
- positive
EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZATION WITH UREA AND GIBBERELLIC ACID ON SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.). · 2009
- positive
RESPONSE OF SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES TO COMBINATIONS OF NITROGEN AND BORON FERTILIZATION. · 2011
- positive
EFFECT OF BIO AND MINERAL FERTILIZATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET · 2012
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
Sugarbeet Yield and Quality When Substituting Compost or Manure for Conventional Nitrogen Fertilizer · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
Response of Sugarbeet for Distance Between Hills and Nitrogenous Levels under Different Sowing Dates · 2014
- positive
Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet under Boron and Mineral and Bio- Nitrogen Fertilization · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
Effect of nano fertilization on sugar beet · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 37
Long‐term Nitrogen Rates and Sources Influence Sugarbeet Yield and Quality1 · 1975
- negative
Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Percentage of Crown Tissue and Quality of Sugarbeets · 1976
- negative
- negative
- negative
Effect of N Fertilization on Sugarbeet Crown Tissue Production and Processing Quality1 · 1978
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Sugarbeet Response to Incremental Application of Nitrogen with High Frequency Sprinkler Irrigation · 1981
- no effect
- negative
Effect of Incrementing Nitrogen Application on Sucrose Yield of Sugarbeet · 1988
- negative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
Changes in N Composition of Sugar Beet Varieties in Response to Increasing N Supply · 2005
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET AS INFLUENCED BY NITROGEN FERTILIZER AND SOME MICRONUTRIENTS · 2011
- negative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
- negative
EFFECT OF MINERAL AND BIO-FERTILIZATION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET · 2014
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
Sugar Beet Response to Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization Treatments in Sandy Soil · 2017
- negative
Impact of conservation tillage and nitrogen on sugarbeet yield and quality · 2019
- negative
- negative
- negative
Nitrogen Fertigation Interval for Sugarbeet Grown on Soils With a High Leaching Potential · 2019
- negative
- negative
- negative
Effect of nitrogen and boron fertilization on the productivity and quality of sugar beet · 2023
- negative
ALLEVIATION OF SALT STRESS ON SUGAR BEET BY NITROGEN, SPIRULINA ALGAE EXTRACT AND POTASSIUM SILICATE · 2024
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.