Paper · 2014 · Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches

Response of Sugarbeet for Distance Between Hills and Nitrogenous Levels under Different Sowing Dates

ShahrZad Neana; Kamla Abd El Hak

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at the Research Experimental Farmof Sabahia Agricultural Research Station in Alexandria during the two successive growingseasons of 2011/ 12 and 2012/ 13. BTS 303 genotype sugarbeet was cultivated to investigatethe effect of three sowing dates (15 Sept., 15 Oct.,and 15 Nov.); three plant spacing betweenhills (15, 25 and 35 cm.).and three nitrogen levels ( 60, 90 and 120 kg N / Fed. as ammoniumnitrate 33.5%N ) which were added on two equal doses before 1st, and 2nd, irrigation onsugarbeet yield and Quality. The result indicated that:Root ,fresh top , sugar yield T.S.S.% , sucrose % and purity% were superior due to 25 cmbetween hills. In both seasons, root and sugar yield were significantly decreased by planting inthe date on15 Oct.. Root, fresh top ,sugar yield ,T.S.S.% and sucrose % of sugarbeet root weresignificantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels from 60 up to 90 N kg / fed. There were asignificant interaction of sowing dates and distances between hills with regard to rootyield(t./fed) and purity % in both seasons, while on T.S.S.% and sucrose % in the first season.Statistically significant effect of sowing dates, plant spacing between hills and nitrogenfertilizers levels, on root yield (t./fed) and purity % in both seasons and their combinedanalysis.Generally, as a conclusion and on the basis of the obtained results that planting BTS 303sugarbeet on (25 cm between hills) ,sowing on October and. 90 kg N/ fed at two equal dosesbefore 1st, and 2nd, irrigation produced the highest yield and quality under Alexandria conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 cm between hills gave superior root, fresh top and sugar yield.

Treatment
25 cmbetween hillse0
Outcome
Root ,fresh top , sugar yielde0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root ,fresh top , sugar yield T.S.S.% , sucrose % and purity% were superior due to 25 cmbetween hills”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 cm between hills gave superior TSS, sucrose and purity.

Treatment
25 cmbetween hillse0
Outcome
T.S.S.% , sucrose % and purity%e0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root ,fresh top , sugar yield T.S.S.% , sucrose % and purity% were superior due to 25 cmbetween hills”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 15 October significantly decreased root and sugar yield in both seasons.

Treatment
on15 Oct.e0
Outcome
root and sugar yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both seasons, root and sugar yield were significantly decreased by planting inthe date on15 Oct.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 60 to 90 N kg/fed significantly increased root, fresh top and sugar yield.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen levels from 60 up to 90 N kg / fede0
Outcome
Root, fresh top ,sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root, fresh top ,sugar yield ,T.S.S.% and sucrose % of sugarbeet root weresignificantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels from 60 up to 90 N kg / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 60 to 90 N kg/fed significantly increased root TSS and sucrose.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen levels from 60 up to 90 N kg / fede0
Outcome
T.S.S.% and sucrose %e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root, fresh top ,sugar yield ,T.S.S.% and sucrose % of sugarbeet root weresignificantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels from 60 up to 90 N kg / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–937 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date and spacing interacted significantly for root yield and purity in both seasons.

Treatment
sowing dates and distances between hillse0
Outcome
rootyield(t./fed) and purity %e0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant interaction of sowing dates and distances between hills with regard to rootyield(t./fed) and purity % in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date and spacing interacted significantly for TSS and sucrose in the first season.

Treatment
sowing dates and distances between hillse1
Outcome
T.S.S.% and sucrose %e0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while on T.S.S.% and sucrose % in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant interaction of sowing dates and distances between hills”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date, spacing and nitrogen levels significantly affected root yield and purity.

Treatment
sowing dates, plant spacing between hills and nitrogenfertilizers levelse0
Outcome
root yield (t./fed) and purity %e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically significant effect of sowing dates, plant spacing between hills and nitrogenfertilizers levels, on root yield (t./fed) and purity % in both seasons and their combinedanalysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 25 cm spacing, October sowing and 90 kg N/fed for highest yield and quality in Alexandria.

Material
BTS 303e0
Treatment
25 cm between hillse0
Outcome
highest yield and qualitye0
Setting
Alexandria conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting BTS 303sugarbeet on (25 cm between hills) ,sowing on October and. 90 kg N/ fed at two equal dosesbefore 1st, and 2nd, irrigation produced the highest yield and quality under Alexandria conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1598 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.