Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Incrementing Nitrogen Application on Sucrose Yield of Sugarbeet

Frank N. Anderson; Gary A. Peterson

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen fertilization of sugarbeet ( Beta vulgaris L.) usually increases root yields but decreases sucrose concentration. Therefore, management strategies must aim at an optimization of both that leads to maximum sucrose yield and not root yield. This study explored the value of applying N in increments to increase sucrose production and decrease top growth and impurities of the sugarbeet crop. The soil was depleted of N by cropping with corn ( Zea mays L.) each year prior to the sugarbeet production year. Total N rates from 30 to 300 kg ha −1 N were applied in increments of 30,60, and 90 kg ha −1 over a time span of 16 wk each year of the experiment for 3 yr on a Tripp very fine sandy loam (coarse‐silty, mixed, mesic Typic Haplustoll). A series of hail storms in the second year of the experiment caused the N requirement to be higher for that year, as N in the leaves removed by the hail did not recycle. The first and third years demonstrated a normal pattern of greater top growth, lower sucrose concentration, and lower purity as N rates increased. Optimum N rates were 50 kg ha −1 higher for root yields than for maximum sucrose production. Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applications favored root development and sucrose production but did not affect top growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hail in the second year raised nitrogen requirement.

Outcome
N requiremente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second year of the experimente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A series of hail storms in the second year of the experiment caused the N requirement to be higher for that year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rates increased sugarbeet top growth in years one and three.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
top growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
first and third yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first and third years demonstrated a normal pattern of greater top growth, lower sucrose concentration, and lower purity as N rates increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rates lowered sugarbeet sucrose concentration in years one and three.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
sucrose concentratione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first and third years demonstrated a normal pattern of greater top growth, lower sucrose concentration, and lower purity as N rates increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rates lowered sugarbeet purity in years one and three.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
puritye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first and third years demonstrated a normal pattern of greater top growth, lower sucrose concentration, and lower purity as N rates increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal nitrogen rate for sugarbeet root yield exceeded that for maximum sucrose production by 50 kg ha −1.

Outcome
Optimum N ratese0
Direction
highere0
Value
50 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
maximum sucrose productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum N rates were 50 kg ha −1 higher for root yields than for maximum sucrose production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen supply favored sugarbeet root development.

Treatment
Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applications favored root development and sucrose production but did not affect top growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen supply favored sugarbeet sucrose production.

Treatment
Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
sucrose productione0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applications favored root development and sucrose production but did not affect top growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen supply did not affect sugarbeet top growth.

Treatment
Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
top growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applications favored root development and sucrose production but did not affect top growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 97 positive, 12 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.